Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
26. It's a mistake to say middle America was ignored- the policies were there and she spoke to them
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 04:42 PM
Feb 2017

Often- despite the crap some are pushing. The problem is the media made it about personalities- not that Hillary did. To this day I see "lefties" pushing nonsense about her elevating DT when he was mentioned as one of three who could be spoilers for more popular candidates. SOP campaign stuff is routinely demonized and made into character assasination and some of us helped this effort to discredit a good nominee. and they are doing the same to other decent Dems by continuing to equate them with the GOP.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And none of it matters get the red out Feb 2017 #1
THIS Zoonart Feb 2017 #3
We don't have to pretend our campaign was flawless to acknowledge that Russia messed with things. Ken Burch Feb 2017 #4
We sure don't get the red out Feb 2017 #19
That's something to hope for. Ken Burch Feb 2017 #21
It's a matter of timing, as well as priorities. Russia and the assist they got from bettyellen Feb 2017 #20
And I join you in calling for the Russian role to be addressed. Ken Burch Feb 2017 #22
It's a mistake to say middle America was ignored- the policies were there and she spoke to them bettyellen Feb 2017 #26
That may have contributed; but she "lost" thanks primarily to Putin's vote hackers. tenorly Feb 2017 #2
Provide any evidence of vote "hacking" brooklynite Feb 2017 #7
Absence of evidence, lest we forget, isn't evidence of absence. tenorly Feb 2017 #15
Stephen Miller would be proud... brooklynite Feb 2017 #23
He'd be proud of someone who likes to shoot down allegations of pro-Trump Russian vote tampering. tenorly Feb 2017 #27
So can people finally say that here without being accused of ignoring Putin and racism Ken Burch Feb 2017 #5
No, wrong, she lost because elmac Feb 2017 #6
idiots don't understand media editing. unblock Feb 2017 #8
I'm still convinced Obama could save a baby from a burning building... Initech Feb 2017 #9
This subject has been approached before but you don't hear it. Ford_Prefect Feb 2017 #11
yes, hillary could have run an even better campaign. unblock Feb 2017 #13
Yes!!! Phoenix61 Feb 2017 #16
She lost for 1 and only 1 reason. And that is just undeniable. FigTree Feb 2017 #10
we all did. That helped him to connect even more. Sunlei Feb 2017 #12
OF COURSE every person running for the job of chief organizer will UNANIMOUSLY pnwmom Feb 2017 #14
Hillary's Campaign Attacked The Wrong Way videohead5 Feb 2017 #17
I think the FBI intervention cost her a lot of votes, not just enough to enable her to narrowly win. StevieM Feb 2017 #31
He sounds like Dolt45: "Only I know what went wrong and how to fix it!" randome Feb 2017 #18
wrong Wibly Feb 2017 #24
She didn't listen to the DNC and state parties TexasBushwhacker Feb 2017 #28
Hillary lost because when she was 9 points ahead in the polls pnwmom Feb 2017 #30
Hardcore Denial: over 1000 Dem seats lost in 8 years. They all talked too much about Trump. delisen Feb 2017 #25
If Hillary was running against Hitler, should she have done nothing pnwmom Feb 2017 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author DonViejo Feb 2017 #29
She lost because the FBI (and State Dept. Inspector General's Office) repeatedly lied to StevieM Feb 2017 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The Daily 202: DNC chair ...»Reply #26