Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: White House looking at ethics rule to weaken special investigation: sources [View all]elleng
(130,861 posts)18. Depends on nature of any action against jared;
he may be somehow insulated, for a while at least.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
White House looking at ethics rule to weaken special investigation: sources [View all]
brooklynite
May 2017
OP
Reports like this show just how conscious the White House is of their guilt. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2017
#2
'In addition to his speaking and teaching roles, Mueller also joined the law firm WilmerHale
elleng
May 2017
#6
Yup. This "ethics" complaint is as fake as the claims Trump fired Comey for being mean to Hillary.
emulatorloo
May 2017
#27
My guess it that Congressional Repugs would be silent (like most are now) -if they carried out these
riversedge
May 2017
#22
Do you remember when this kind of talk would have called for immediate demands for impeachment?
Baitball Blogger
May 2017
#12
But look at their plan of what they would do--and they would have hate radio, fox, blaring it 24/7..
riversedge
May 2017
#21
I find it hard to believe this wasn't known before the appointment of Mueller.
rzemanfl
May 2017
#16
They let sessions in despite his perjury , price in spite of financial crimes, Flynn in spite
notdarkyet
May 2017
#20
An executive order signed by Trump in January extended that period to two years.
flibbitygiblets
May 2017
#24
RIGHT. That is what stood out to me. Of course, Trump wouldn't have known anything about
Laura PourMeADrink
May 2017
#37
Weird - Reuters was saying that Trump extended from 1 year to 2, right...but...
Laura PourMeADrink
May 2017
#38