Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Docreed2003

(16,855 posts)
55. But again...
Sat Sep 30, 2017, 01:32 AM
Sep 2017

A). Two of those OR's are "emergency use"
B). Who's going to run them and staff them?? To run six ORs at the same time would require 6 surgeons, 6 anesthesia types, 6 OR nurses, 6 scrub techs at a minimum, and that's just the bare minimum of staff, not to mention the equipment and resources needed. Our mass casualty plan, even in situations like this one, was never built on the idea that patients would be operated on in that fashion. Our mass casualty plan consisted of using our best resource, the air support, and getting patients seen and stabilized and sent out...the OR was only used in an absolute must use scenario. In fact, during our mass casualty drills, once I decided to take a patient to the OR, our team was pulled from the exercise for at least an hour, to simulate exactly what would happen during a real world scenario.
C). I'm not sure where they're getting that in 2011 it was outfitted with three ORs because in had three main ORs in 2010, maybe that's referring to the "emergency" ORs. I can't say, but I'll reach out to a buddy of mine that was on the ship in 2011 and find out the answer.
D). The "supporting 600 patients" is the sticky wicket in Ponds' quote...yes, that's theoretically possible once the area below decks where logistical equipment and supplies are stored after they've been off loaded, but you couldn't reach that capacity on arrival...unless you're going to choose to legitimately leave your largest ship in the Amphibious Assault Group intentionally empty while going to a humanitarian crisis, which we both know is not the case.

Anyway, not picking a fight over a nitpick, although it seems others are being quite snarky in this thread. Just wanted to throw in my own 2c and experience. I love that ship dearly, even though it's a completely different crew now.

How many days were allowed to pass without action? truthisfreedom Sep 2017 #1
The were US Marines & Sailors on the island the morning after the hurricane Lurks Often Sep 2017 #8
I've been watching the cargo planes out of Tyndall Air Base Stryst Sep 2017 #2
And that was a huge service, Stryst. Thank you! pnwmom Sep 2017 #3
Military rescuers are like uniformed angels peacebuzzard Sep 2017 #6
Thank you Stryst & all currently serving! nt appal_jack Sep 2017 #9
Why the fuck has the USNS Comfort hospital ship been sitting in Norfolk all this time? SunSeeker Sep 2017 #4
Because it's inferior to the USS Kearsarge and can't dock in Puerto Rico right now. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #11
Link? And even if it can't dock, small boats can bring patients to it. SunSeeker Sep 2017 #13
The USNS Comfort has a 33 foot draft. San Juan port has a channel depth of 34.7 feet. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #14
I see you have no link. It CAN anchor offshore, with smaller boats bringing patients to it. SunSeeker Sep 2017 #15
The Kearsarge is a hospital. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #18
None of that disputes that it can anchor offshore, with smaller boats bringing patients to it. SunSeeker Sep 2017 #21
IT IS AN OIL TANKER. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #23
It is a hospital ship. Trump should have sent it and every other one we had available. SunSeeker Sep 2017 #29
Why? AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #30
What part of 3.5 million Americans with no food, power or hospitals do you not understand? SunSeeker Sep 2017 #35
It is 'moving big things around' if the big thing isn't able to aid them. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #37
The Comfort would aid people. SunSeeker Sep 2017 #39
It does create a bottleneck. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #40
Saving 1500 lives is not a "rounding error." SunSeeker Sep 2017 #41
But 5000 national guard in place before the hurricane hit is a "mealy mouthed response". AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #43
The two are not comparable. 5K Natl Guard IS "mealy mouthed." SunSeeker Sep 2017 #44
Not at all. First of all, the president doesn't activate the national guard in this manner. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #52
WRONG. The President does not need to be "king" to activate US troops in emergencies. SunSeeker Sep 2017 #56
You continued attempt to re-cast pointing out reality as 'defending trump' is noxious and part AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #58
You were not "pointing out reality." You wrongly suggested he couldn't call out more NG. SunSeeker Sep 2017 #61
No, that's how you insisted on reading it. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #62
Instead of spending 9 paragraphs trying to redefine one sentence... SunSeeker Oct 2017 #63
It only reads that way if you pretend I said words I didn't say. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #64
It is you who wants to add words that were not there, 9 paragraphs of them. nt SunSeeker Oct 2017 #65
Elaboration isn't adding. You attempted to twist the meaning, not me. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #66
LOL I didn't "twist" anything. SunSeeker Oct 2017 #67
You did. My original post is still there in context for everyone to see. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #68
Everyone can indeed see that you suggested he couldn't do it. SunSeeker Oct 2017 #69
Doesn't ! Couldn't. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #70
I'm not being "dishonest." You wrongly implied Trump couldn't order more NG. SunSeeker Oct 2017 #71
You're free to keep saying it, but that's not what the post says. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #72
I'm not "confused" nor "dishonest." I call 'em as I see 'em. SunSeeker Oct 2017 #73
Then why did you misconstrue '9 paragraphs'. AtheistCrusader Oct 2017 #74
I did not misconstrue your 9 paragraphs. It was obvious why you posted them. SunSeeker Oct 2017 #75
Houston got 12K from the TX National Guard TexasBushwhacker Sep 2017 #60
The Kearsarge isn't a hospital...it's an amphibious assault ship Docreed2003 Sep 2017 #51
It currently does. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #54
But again... Docreed2003 Sep 2017 #55
Frankly, all the Wasp class ships are genius designs. I think they are fantastic. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #59
Thank you for your review of our capabilities - very educational. KY_EnviroGuy Sep 2017 #46
Thanks for trying. flying rabbit Sep 2017 #57
It's used in many places where it can't dock. It stands offshore with transport to it. SharonAnn Sep 2017 #49
And there is a history of how many many people it can handle when docked versus at anchor. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #53
It left VA a few days ago. Article posted on du. I do not know when it will arrive in PR. riversedge Oct 2017 #76
Yes, I know. But no one can explain why it took so long for it to leave for PR. SunSeeker Oct 2017 #77
Pathetic, the repeated use of the word 'sortie' in this context ... who WROTE this? mr_lebowski Sep 2017 #5
oh for pete's sake. "Sortie" can be used to describe any mission. 7962 Sep 2017 #7
Yes they are sorties hack89 Sep 2017 #10
Pogey bait sorties sarisataka Sep 2017 #16
Only when the auto-dog was down. nt hack89 Sep 2017 #20
Auto-dog? DashOneBravo Sep 2017 #47
Visualize chocolate soft serve ice cream. hack89 Sep 2017 #50
I always had pogey bait DashOneBravo Sep 2017 #48
Someone who speaks english. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #12
Perhaps the 'mission' part of the definition... discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2017 #45
You are correct. It is indeed odd to call rescue flights "sorties." SunSeeker Sep 2017 #17
Merriam Webster Dictionary. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #19
Webster's confirms what I am saying. SunSeeker Sep 2017 #22
IT'S A MILITARY NEWS SITE. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #24
Chill dude. And yes, Trump's incompetence has everything to do with this. SunSeeker Sep 2017 #25
Play games with someone else. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #26
YOU'RE the one who followed me to this subthread. nt SunSeeker Sep 2017 #27
Excuse me, I posted in this subthread before you even showed up. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #28
I was responding to Mr Lebowski. You butted in. nt SunSeeker Sep 2017 #31
Look one post higher in the subthread. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #32
I was not responding to you. Yet you felt compelled to attack me. SunSeeker Sep 2017 #33
I responded to post 17 in the manner appropriate to its content. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #34
I was not talking to you, so you were not "responding" to me, you were butting in. SunSeeker Sep 2017 #36
I can keep hitting reply if you can. AtheistCrusader Sep 2017 #38
Sounds like they need more troops, though. Ilsa Sep 2017 #42
K&R stonecutter357 Oct 2017 #78
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US troops deliver food, s...»Reply #55