Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(5,953 posts)

17. Personally, I think Xavier Becerra would be better.

Thu Oct 12, 2017, 06:34 PM

Oct 2017

But I guess he's not interested in challenging Feinstein?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Excellent, we need new blood in the Senate. denbot Oct 2017 #1

I hope he doesn't "go low". My prediction? Feinstein in a walk over. George II Oct 2017 #2

I wonder where your concern springs from? denbot Oct 2017 #6

Glad to hear it. zentrum Oct 2017 #3

Post removed Post removed Oct 2017 #4

Juvenile name-calling is...juvenile brooklynite Oct 2017 #5

Good n/t hibbing Oct 2017 #7

Good for him.. disillusioned73 Oct 2017 #8

Steyer was on MSNBC last night. BigmanPigman Oct 2017 #9

Neither will get my vote, I'll be voting for Feinstein. iluvtennis Oct 2017 #10

Second verse, same as the first displacedtexan Oct 2017 #11

Love it. BlueJac Oct 2017 #12

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.... Plucketeer Oct 2017 #13

Glad that there are multiple viable challengers. They will split any vote stevenleser Oct 2017 #15

California does a jungle primary right? madville Oct 2017 #16

That would be suicide. Hopefully no Democrat would do that. TrollBuster9090 Oct 2017 #18

Our "jungle primary/blanket primary" means the top two candidates... MoonchildCA Oct 2017 #19

Correct. In fact, that's what happened in 2016. Jim Lane Oct 2017 #20

Personally, I think Xavier Becerra would be better. TrollBuster9090 Oct 2017 #17