Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
2. Don't know why his accusations are relevant.
Wed Jan 3, 2018, 04:25 PM
Jan 2018

Why would it matter HOW he got caught?

Rhetorical question - I'll stay tuned ...

I hope he bankrupts himself with the legal fees Happyhippychick Jan 2018 #1
I was going to say that his lawyers better demand payment up front TexasBushwhacker Jan 2018 #25
"bankrupts himself with the legal fees" He had to hock a couple houses, didn't he? mpcamb Jan 2018 #30
Don't know why his accusations are relevant. Lil Missy Jan 2018 #2
They aren't relevant. But it does matter how a person is caught. Look up Oliver North. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2018 #21
Yeah PatSeg Jan 2018 #22
remind me under what authorization did republicans investigate that whole monica thing? unblock Jan 2018 #3
Oh, but that was different..... acts between consenting adults are everybody's business groundloop Jan 2018 #4
Or Benghazi or fail to properly investigate 9/11... Roland99 Jan 2018 #5
GOP would investigate President Hillary Clinton for Eliot Rosewater Jan 2018 #26
Different authorizing statute onenote Jan 2018 #7
Starr went everywhere trying to make a case. Went on for over a year. I think it all notdarkyet Jan 2018 #16
five years, believe it or not. unblock Jan 2018 #20
Lock Him Up! jpak Jan 2018 #6
Maybe he's using this to hamstring Mueller's investigation woodsprite Jan 2018 #8
This was my thought as well... EarthFirst Jan 2018 #15
See posts 7 and 10 onenote Jan 2018 #19
Yes. Trump Gang main weapon is endless litigation. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2018 #23
So Mueller is just supposed to ignore any crimes he might uncover? MGKrebs Jan 2018 #9
That, in essence, is the crux of Manafort's lawsuit onenote Jan 2018 #10
Never heard of such a thing...unbelievable. So this means Harvey Weinstein can file suit against iluvtennis Jan 2018 #11
ordinarily, discovery would be a deterrent to this kind of legal abuse 0rganism Jan 2018 #12
Good luck asshole... BlueIdaho Jan 2018 #13
How is this not a SLAPP suit? nt SunSeeker Jan 2018 #14
There is no federal anti-SLAPP lawsuit law. onenote Jan 2018 #32
Sure it would be. It names specific individuals (Brownstein & Mueller). SunSeeker Jan 2018 #35
They'd be SLAPPIN' the wrong party! Lil Missy Jan 2018 #34
Well...good luck with that. paleotn Jan 2018 #17
This BASTARD has broken probation rules BigmanPigman Jan 2018 #18
my thoughts are as days go by Manaforts bluestarone Jan 2018 #24
AG enid602 Jan 2018 #27
Jail that piece of shit now onecaliberal Jan 2018 #28
And speaking of Schneiderman Thekaspervote Jan 2018 #29
According to this, it could get interesting if the suit goes forward........ riversedge Jan 2018 #31
Indeed it is more a delaying/diversionary tactic rather than one with any likelihood to prevail. n/t PoliticAverse Jan 2018 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump ex-Campaign Chair M...»Reply #2