Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(36,247 posts)
4. Well, journos do oversimplify in the lead paras ...
Tue Feb 13, 2018, 01:31 PM
Feb 2018

If you read further down, you learn that the thinking here is not that people weren't looking in soil samples (that's largely where antibiotics have been discovered -- and in the sea, sewage, etc.) but that they had been using specific techniques which don't work well for many microbes. Rapid DNA sequencing has made it possible to analyze microbial DNA directly from soil samples and examine those for clues to create new antibiotic screening methods, rather than isolating the organisms that produce the antibiotics by growing them in cultures.

Note that the researchers here were looking for a specific genetic sequence, based on a reasonable assumption -- one which will not be true in all cases, and thus allow some candidates to be missed, as well. The challenge to broadening this approach will be figuring out what sequences to search for -- they are not directly seeking the specific sequences for making the antibiotics, since they don't even know what those would be. So what do they look for ?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»A potentially powerful ne...»Reply #4