Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
"Facing a real emergency against the rule of law" - if it's against the rule of law then... PoliticAverse Feb 2019 #1
Doubtful that the Senate would ever override the expected veto, but what the hell. Give it a go. dameatball Feb 2019 #2
Plus, it puts Cheeto on the spot. sandensea Feb 2019 #3
True. That's one angle. Like I said.....give it a go and see what happens. dameatball Feb 2019 #4
Amazing, isn't it. sandensea Feb 2019 #7
so does the senate need to vote too? If so, not going anywhere beachbum bob Feb 2019 #5
Several Senate Republicans, however, have announced they'll vote to block Orange Amin sandensea Feb 2019 #6
I have a good feeling about the first vote in the Senate. Not so much on the veto override. dameatball Feb 2019 #8
Definitely looks that way sandensea Feb 2019 #9
I can't imagine McConnell's going to let this bill fly to a normal vote process in the Senate. Honeycombe8 Feb 2019 #10
+1 sandensea Feb 2019 #11
The National Emergencies Act requires both houses vote within a set time onenote Feb 2019 #12
And...what is anyone going to do about it, if McConnell won't allow it? Honeycombe8 Feb 2019 #13
There is no law requiring a vote on Supreme Court justices (or any other appointee). onenote Feb 2019 #14
Yes, there is. Confirmation of the nominee Justice is required by law. nt Honeycombe8 Feb 2019 #15
No. onenote Feb 2019 #16
I don't understand all the ins and outs Maxheader Feb 2019 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The House will vote Tuesd...»Reply #9