Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Michael Avenatti releases documents alleging Nike paid top NCAA recruits [View all]More_Cowbell
(2,191 posts)11. No.
He tried to extort Nike to enter into contracts with him and his associates. Someone who believes that Nike is gaming the system, and exploiting kids, wouldn't do that.
It doesn't make his claims untrue. In fact, in my mind it makes them more likely to be true. Just not the way an ethical lawyer works (I am a member of a state bar myself, non practicing).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Michael Avenatti releases documents alleging Nike paid top NCAA recruits [View all]
sandensea
Apr 2019
OP
Burden of proof of extortion is on Nike. I believe Avenatti's got the evidence of Nike corruption.nt
ancianita
Apr 2019
#4
Since they have him on tape threatening to release the info if they dont pay, they've got it.
oldsoftie
Apr 2019
#22
even if he is right, is this the way a reputable lawyer handles such things?
EveHammond13
Apr 2019
#6
If he really was extorting Nike I would think the bar would cancel his license...
Kablooie
Apr 2019
#8
On the other hand it could be argued they claimed extortion to try and silence him.
cstanleytech
Apr 2019
#12
Nancy is way better at it than him. So is Al Franken. So is Rosie O'Donnell. So is Hillary.
LuvLoogie
Apr 2019
#59