Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(128,748 posts)
Tue Apr 23, 2019, 05:25 PM Apr 2019

White House plans to fight House subpoena of former counsel Donald McGahn for testimony [View all]

Source: Washington Post



The White House plans to fight a subpoena issued by the House Judiciary Committee for former White House counsel Donald McGahn to testify, according to people familiar with the matter, setting up another showdown in the aftermath of the special counsel report.

The Trump administration also plans to oppose other requests from House committees for the testimony of current and former aides about actions in the White House described in special counsel Robert S. Mueller III's report, according to two people familiar with internal thinking.

White House lawyers plan to tell attorneys for administration witnesses called by the House that they will be asserting executive privilege over their testimony, officials said. Such a move will intensify an ongoing power struggle between the Trump administration and congressional Democrats, potentially setting up a protracted court battle.

McGahn was mentioned more than 150 times in Mueller's report and provided damaging accounts to investigators about how the president pressured him to oust the special counsel and then pushed him to publicly deny the episode. McGahn's lawyer, William Burck, began discussions with the House Judiciary Committee about his potential testimony after the panel issued a subpoena Monday, according to people familiar with the matter. Securing McGahn's testimony would be a boon for the Judiciary Committee, which hopes to focus on potential obstruction of justice by Trump in a series of public hearings this spring while exploring other "abuses of power," Democratic aides said.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-plans-to-fight-house-subpoena-of-former-counsel-donald-mcgahn-for-testimony-on-mueller-report/2019/04/23/2d48732a-65f1-11e9-83df-04f4d124151f_story.html



Full title: White House plans to fight House subpoena of former counsel Donald McGahn for testimony on Mueller report
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm no lawyer, but i dont think executive privilege covers illegal acts oldsoftie Apr 2019 #1
It may end up in the courts BumRushDaShow Apr 2019 #2
I thought McGahn had already waved executive privilege. If he had it anyway. dem4decades Apr 2019 #3
I think it is only the President that has such BumRushDaShow Apr 2019 #5
He's provided public testimony on his convos w #Traitor to Mueller Arazi Apr 2019 #8
But, if McGahn wants to testify, I don't think EP can PREVENT him from appearing and testifying. machoneman Apr 2019 #11
This is exactly how someone who was "completely exonerated" behaves! forgotmylogin Apr 2019 #18
They're the law and order party. Mc Mike Apr 2019 #4
Staggering paranoia! "I've got nothing to hide." - my ass! Firestorm49 Apr 2019 #6
tRump fighting scorched earth rearguard actions that won't win the war even if win battle or two. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2019 #7
STALL STALL STALL bluestarone Apr 2019 #9
This is why I hate giving them weeks to comply with the subpoena. They may as well make it... PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #10
Yes! Exactly! No reason to delay! Let those subpeonas fly! machoneman Apr 2019 #12
They will delay and obfuscate at every turn. Turbineguy Apr 2019 #13
Burning bridges every day. Nixon attempted the same rear guard action. He lost. Ford_Prefect Apr 2019 #14
Nixon tried... atreides1 Apr 2019 #15
If it is a case that there is no previous testimony by the witness then privilege might apply. But Ford_Prefect Apr 2019 #16
Good luck with that! At some point the courts will have made all the decisions they can make and Nitram Apr 2019 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House plans to figh...