Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ford_Prefect

(7,876 posts)
16. If it is a case that there is no previous testimony by the witness then privilege might apply. But
Tue Apr 23, 2019, 08:29 PM
Apr 2019

If I recall correctly the testimony was given and has been conveyed. The privilege no longer applies. Yes, It may take time. The longer it takes the closer the election gets. at some point Congressional Republicans will have to consider if they want to be caught out defending Trump when he does lose in court or when the really damaging info hits the fan. Some of them are not going to want to ride that one. as it is there are at least 3 Republicans who have said they plan to enter the primary. 2 of them have meaningful standing in the party, executive experience, and a very different view of the law than Trump. While they may not beat the party machinery they can argue that Trump is an awful choice to continue with by pointing out the damage he has done to the economy and international relations among other topics.

It was rather difficult when Nixon was there and it was the cover-up evidence that did for him, rather than the crimes under his watch. It took 15 months and the repeated exposure of executive malfeasance to drag Congress to the point of preparing to refer Impeachment articles to the Senate. Public opinion was widely divided and wildly manipulated. In the end the evidence was persuasive and Republicans did not want to defend Nixon in the face of it.

We have a very different set of forces today. However that doesn't mean it will not succeed. Nor does it mean he cannot be Impeached. The process could be long and ugly. The Ugly may work against the defendant in the long run. To some extent the law is clear and the Duty to Impeach is not something to ignore without consequence IMHO.

I'm no lawyer, but i dont think executive privilege covers illegal acts oldsoftie Apr 2019 #1
It may end up in the courts BumRushDaShow Apr 2019 #2
I thought McGahn had already waved executive privilege. If he had it anyway. dem4decades Apr 2019 #3
I think it is only the President that has such BumRushDaShow Apr 2019 #5
He's provided public testimony on his convos w #Traitor to Mueller Arazi Apr 2019 #8
But, if McGahn wants to testify, I don't think EP can PREVENT him from appearing and testifying. machoneman Apr 2019 #11
This is exactly how someone who was "completely exonerated" behaves! forgotmylogin Apr 2019 #18
They're the law and order party. Mc Mike Apr 2019 #4
Staggering paranoia! "I've got nothing to hide." - my ass! Firestorm49 Apr 2019 #6
tRump fighting scorched earth rearguard actions that won't win the war even if win battle or two. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2019 #7
STALL STALL STALL bluestarone Apr 2019 #9
This is why I hate giving them weeks to comply with the subpoena. They may as well make it... PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #10
Yes! Exactly! No reason to delay! Let those subpeonas fly! machoneman Apr 2019 #12
They will delay and obfuscate at every turn. Turbineguy Apr 2019 #13
Burning bridges every day. Nixon attempted the same rear guard action. He lost. Ford_Prefect Apr 2019 #14
Nixon tried... atreides1 Apr 2019 #15
If it is a case that there is no previous testimony by the witness then privilege might apply. But Ford_Prefect Apr 2019 #16
Good luck with that! At some point the courts will have made all the decisions they can make and Nitram Apr 2019 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House plans to figh...»Reply #16