Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
43. The one doesn't deny the other.
Tue Jul 9, 2019, 01:47 PM
Jul 2019

"I'm more interested in taking him down for what I view as the far more serious crime. "


The one doesn't deny the prosecution of other, regardless of the irrelevancies of what you're interested in.

Are you clear?

It is sad it is only 45 years. titaniumsalute Jul 2019 #1
It would be, no thanks to Acosta and that bullshit Florida judge. ancianita Jul 2019 #5
But that's just for one charge of trafficking and one of conspiracy. defacto7 Jul 2019 #16
If these victims were 'children', legally ... it WOULD be far more than 45 years proposed here mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #29
Maybe he and Harvey Weinstein can share a cell together. Initech Jul 2019 #2
I'm hoping for a cellmate for him who's very big, young, strong and horny. fierywoman Jul 2019 #10
Why those particular characteristics? Why the "horny?" Please be specific. Thanks! PSPS Jul 2019 #24
I am hoping that the population finds him offensive enough Lithos Jul 2019 #51
That would be an equally positive outcome! fierywoman Jul 2019 #54
Low blow, man ... Spacey's offenses are nowhere NEAR the severity of Weinsteins mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #30
Yeah true you can't lump Spacey in with those monsters. Initech Jul 2019 #35
Where are all the Possession of Child Porn charges?! donkeypoofed Jul 2019 #3
Kiddie porn Berlin Expat Jul 2019 #7
My guess would be that their 'collaborative' value in terms of 'putting the witnesses where they say mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #32
One would think that there are possible state charges to come as well Sherman A1 Jul 2019 #13
Gonna have to take away his money first I'm afraid ... mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #31
You think you look "haggard" NOW, Epstein? HA HA yeah, you ain't seen nuthin yet Leghorn21 Jul 2019 #4
I'm pissed that this no-bail judgment is not permanent, but maybe more time's given to stop ancianita Jul 2019 #6
Unfortunately this is a Federal Case Stonepounder Jul 2019 #8
Probably. But with that pardon is admission of guilt. The evidence against the pardoner still stands ancianita Jul 2019 #9
And that evidence will open the flood gates leftieNanner Jul 2019 #12
Justice will have to wait bluescribbler Jul 2019 #11
Yep. But this looks as close to it as we've seen yet. ancianita Jul 2019 #14
In the US Attorney Berman's press conference bucolic_frolic Jul 2019 #15
He's listed as a sex criminal on a Virgin Island website. I saw a report and shot of the page. ancianita Jul 2019 #22
"He might be an active offender." dawg day Jul 2019 #27
But who's been letting him get away with this all these years? How? defacto7 Jul 2019 #17
Probably his wealth and connections. Money is freedom to elites. That's how they stay beyond the law ancianita Jul 2019 #18
See how many match with this. LiberalArkie Jul 2019 #52
I've only seen Trump connected to Epstein. None of the others. Do you know something we don't? ancianita Jul 2019 #53
Most of it is from news articles at various. You can wiki just about all the names and come up with LiberalArkie Jul 2019 #56
I do that so much already that I would understand your implication. Just link what I've missed. ancianita Jul 2019 #57
It's like the priests who looked the other way. Interesting parallels and divergences. All monsters. JudyM Jul 2019 #19
then they found the pics and cds WhiteTara Jul 2019 #20
Yep. Hung by his own evidential petard. ancianita Jul 2019 #21
Kinda depends what's on them, frankly ... mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #33
Possessing child porn WhiteTara Jul 2019 #36
Having a nekkid pic of a 16 year old is not as illegal as screwing one mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #37
ask George Nader about that WhiteTara Jul 2019 #38
Reports say 'as young as 14' of his victims, but we don't know he had a pic of a 14 y.o. mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #39
I'm so tempted to ask WhiteTara Jul 2019 #41
I'm not saying he 'should' have them, I'm saying they may have more prosecutorial value mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #42
The one doesn't deny the other. LanternWaste Jul 2019 #43
Fair enough, but, depending on what's IN THEM, they may not be bothering with charges mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #45
No judge would believe that he spent all that money on all those girls just to look at them. ancianita Jul 2019 #50
Yep, if nothing else that will take him down. honest.abe Jul 2019 #34
what a sick fuck he is Skittles Jul 2019 #23
Absolutely should be NO PARDON for this type charge! bluestarone Jul 2019 #25
For Epstein to accept a Pardon Lithos Jul 2019 #55
What jail is he in? dawg day Jul 2019 #26
Manhattan Correctional Center until his final bail hearing on July 15. ancianita Jul 2019 #28
Letting him go free all those years ago allowed him to sexually abuse more children EleanorR Jul 2019 #40
The judge allowed this total travesty of justice, too. JE will lose much of his wealth in the civil ancianita Jul 2019 #44
+1. Acosta also allowed him to hire his own security detail while in prison. dalton99a Jul 2019 #48
This is leverage for a plea bargain if he will testify against others Buckeyeblue Jul 2019 #46
I thought a "not guilty" plea means you tell prosecutors nothing, right? ancianita Jul 2019 #47
Everyone starts out with not guilty Buckeyeblue Jul 2019 #49
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Two Jeffrey Epstein accus...»Reply #43