Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(35,940 posts)
16. Haha. Yes. I hope so, too. But hey, he was born for this. He'll die trying to do what he's doing now
Wed Jul 17, 2019, 11:46 PM
Jul 2019

Can you imagine how much money he'll make as a former president, running this poison called Republican politics?

He will embody the worst of global branding used to capture democracies. He'll thrive.

Disgusting. But electoral college elections have consequences.

Well, that should be interesting! CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2019 #1
Rachel gave me hope about this tonight. Today I've felt pretty hopeless. Tomorrow, tomorrow... ancianita Jul 2019 #2
I wish I could believe that they will change anything DavidDvorkin Jul 2019 #3
How can another court -- and what other court could-- stop this judge's ruling. Doesn't make sense. ancianita Jul 2019 #6
That doesn't mean he won't try! leftieNanner Jul 2019 #9
It's not structurally doable, is what I'm saying. ancianita Jul 2019 #11
You are correct leftieNanner Jul 2019 #13
Brett knows better. Whoever delivers the message wouldn't get past the secretary. ancianita Jul 2019 #29
Higher courts regularly overrule lower ones. DavidDvorkin Jul 2019 #22
If there had been a filing, we'd know by now. ancianita Jul 2019 #27
I think that we should not be saying that tRump is "immune" or everything drops off Doitnow Jul 2019 #15
I don't think that making an observation on DU has a significant effect. DavidDvorkin Jul 2019 #23
We know that. We're thinking together, that's all. And you never know the influence DU has elsewhere ancianita Jul 2019 #28
If these documents show that Barr shut down watoos Jul 2019 #4
I thought Barr's behind-the-scenes pressure caused this drop, which enraged Pauley. The ancianita Jul 2019 #8
My thoughts as well MFM008 Jul 2019 #39
And they lost! I want to send this judge a present, a token of my thanks. The more unredacted docs, ancianita Jul 2019 #40
This and Epstein. No wonder Trump is causing a diversion right now. Doodley Jul 2019 #5
Highly likely. ancianita Jul 2019 #7
Plus today was the originally scheduled leftieNanner Jul 2019 #10
Definitely. While scofflaw fakeprez runs his mouth, the Law will ensnare him. ancianita Jul 2019 #12
Lordy! leftieNanner Jul 2019 #14
Haha. Yes. I hope so, too. But hey, he was born for this. He'll die trying to do what he's doing now ancianita Jul 2019 #16
Ideally he'll have a prior engagement. Marcuse Jul 2019 #18
Oh, Marcuse! leftieNanner Jul 2019 #31
ding, ding, ding...we have a winner! ewagner Jul 2019 #42
I have a feeling a court injunction will come from another court stopping this release. kimbutgar Jul 2019 #17
Only a higher court can do this. What's a higher federal court to stop this? Name it. When a ancianita Jul 2019 #19
Thanks for being up on this kimbutgar Jul 2019 #20
Barr is going down behind this. ancianita Jul 2019 #36
I thought we already knew about these payments. richsonpoordad Jul 2019 #21
We don't know all of them. These redactions must name names, is what I'm thinking. It's a big deal ancianita Jul 2019 #25
Oh, and then customerserviceguy Jul 2019 #24
Yes, you're right. But that has nothing to do with the ammunition this gives the Democratic leaders. ancianita Jul 2019 #26
Thank you for all of your insight in this conversation ancianita leftieNanner Jul 2019 #32
I've been so depressed, this just jumped out at me. Thanks. ancianita Jul 2019 #35
The judge characterized this dump as significant. And he's pissed off. Grasswire2 Jul 2019 #30
That's how Rachel read it, too. He WAS pissed, regardless of neutral judicial wording. ancianita Jul 2019 #33
He is! leftieNanner Jul 2019 #34
Don't we already know all about this? Kablooie Jul 2019 #37
You really think that? We'll see who/what's revealed. Don't think ANY unredacted docs won't be read. ancianita Jul 2019 #38
Yep jberryhill Jul 2019 #41
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»THE DETAILS OF TRUMP'S HU...»Reply #16