Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

leftieNanner

(14,998 posts)
32. Thank you for all of your insight in this conversation ancianita
Thu Jul 18, 2019, 01:21 AM
Jul 2019

It has been very helpful and expanded my understanding.

Well, that should be interesting! CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2019 #1
Rachel gave me hope about this tonight. Today I've felt pretty hopeless. Tomorrow, tomorrow... ancianita Jul 2019 #2
I wish I could believe that they will change anything DavidDvorkin Jul 2019 #3
How can another court -- and what other court could-- stop this judge's ruling. Doesn't make sense. ancianita Jul 2019 #6
That doesn't mean he won't try! leftieNanner Jul 2019 #9
It's not structurally doable, is what I'm saying. ancianita Jul 2019 #11
You are correct leftieNanner Jul 2019 #13
Brett knows better. Whoever delivers the message wouldn't get past the secretary. ancianita Jul 2019 #29
Higher courts regularly overrule lower ones. DavidDvorkin Jul 2019 #22
If there had been a filing, we'd know by now. ancianita Jul 2019 #27
I think that we should not be saying that tRump is "immune" or everything drops off Doitnow Jul 2019 #15
I don't think that making an observation on DU has a significant effect. DavidDvorkin Jul 2019 #23
We know that. We're thinking together, that's all. And you never know the influence DU has elsewhere ancianita Jul 2019 #28
If these documents show that Barr shut down watoos Jul 2019 #4
I thought Barr's behind-the-scenes pressure caused this drop, which enraged Pauley. The ancianita Jul 2019 #8
My thoughts as well MFM008 Jul 2019 #39
And they lost! I want to send this judge a present, a token of my thanks. The more unredacted docs, ancianita Jul 2019 #40
This and Epstein. No wonder Trump is causing a diversion right now. Doodley Jul 2019 #5
Highly likely. ancianita Jul 2019 #7
Plus today was the originally scheduled leftieNanner Jul 2019 #10
Definitely. While scofflaw fakeprez runs his mouth, the Law will ensnare him. ancianita Jul 2019 #12
Lordy! leftieNanner Jul 2019 #14
Haha. Yes. I hope so, too. But hey, he was born for this. He'll die trying to do what he's doing now ancianita Jul 2019 #16
Ideally he'll have a prior engagement. Marcuse Jul 2019 #18
Oh, Marcuse! leftieNanner Jul 2019 #31
ding, ding, ding...we have a winner! ewagner Jul 2019 #42
I have a feeling a court injunction will come from another court stopping this release. kimbutgar Jul 2019 #17
Only a higher court can do this. What's a higher federal court to stop this? Name it. When a ancianita Jul 2019 #19
Thanks for being up on this kimbutgar Jul 2019 #20
Barr is going down behind this. ancianita Jul 2019 #36
I thought we already knew about these payments. richsonpoordad Jul 2019 #21
We don't know all of them. These redactions must name names, is what I'm thinking. It's a big deal ancianita Jul 2019 #25
Oh, and then customerserviceguy Jul 2019 #24
Yes, you're right. But that has nothing to do with the ammunition this gives the Democratic leaders. ancianita Jul 2019 #26
Thank you for all of your insight in this conversation ancianita leftieNanner Jul 2019 #32
I've been so depressed, this just jumped out at me. Thanks. ancianita Jul 2019 #35
The judge characterized this dump as significant. And he's pissed off. Grasswire2 Jul 2019 #30
That's how Rachel read it, too. He WAS pissed, regardless of neutral judicial wording. ancianita Jul 2019 #33
He is! leftieNanner Jul 2019 #34
Don't we already know all about this? Kablooie Jul 2019 #37
You really think that? We'll see who/what's revealed. Don't think ANY unredacted docs won't be read. ancianita Jul 2019 #38
Yep jberryhill Jul 2019 #41
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»THE DETAILS OF TRUMP'S HU...»Reply #32