Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump says Ratcliffe is no longer his pick for director of national intelligence [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(57,379 posts)30. Washington Post opinion: "Another Trump nominee goes down in flames. This is a big one."
The Plum Line Opinion
Another Trump nominee goes down in flames. This is a big one.
By Paul Waldman and Greg Sargent
August 2 at 4:13 PM
Well, that certainly didnt take long:
The fault, as always, lies with Trumps opponents and the media. The unfair treatment to which Trump refers was likely this story in The Post, which showed that Ratcliffes claims about his experience were seriously exaggerated.
Ratcliffe had asserted that as a U.S. Attorney, I arrested over 300 illegal immigrants on a single day. But that was false: He didnt arrest them; the relevant operation ended up charging only 45 poultry workers with low-level offenses; and people involved in it could not recall Ratcliffe playing a central role.
This comes after stories showing that his claims to have tried terrorism cases were also inflated.
The office of DNI has only existed since 2005, and before Trumps election had been filled by people with long careers of service in the military, the intelligence world or both. President George W. Bush appointed Mike McConnell, a Navy vice admiral who had been the director of the National Security Agency. President Barack Obama appointed James R. Clapper Jr., an Air Force lieutenant general who had run the Defense Intelligence Agency.
But those claims of Ratcliffes work stoppin terrorists and ropin illegals were almost the entirety of his qualifications for the job, other than six months sitting on the House Intelligence Committee.
....
Paul Waldman is an opinion writer for the Plum Line blog. Follow https://twitter.com/paulwaldman1
Greg Sargent writes The Plum Line blog. He joined The Post in 2010, after stints at Talking Points Memo, New York Magazine and the New York Observer. Follow https://twitter.com/theplumlinegs
Another Trump nominee goes down in flames. This is a big one.
By Paul Waldman and Greg Sargent
August 2 at 4:13 PM
Well, that certainly didnt take long:
President Trump announced Friday that Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Tex.), his embattled pick to lead the nations intelligence community, was withdrawing from consideration and would remain in Congress.
The lawmaker was facing intense questions about padding his résumé and a lack of experience, which led to a lukewarm reception on Capitol Hill.
Trump said he would announce a new pick for director of national intelligence shortly.
In tweets, Trump said that Ratcliffe was being treated very unfairly by the media.
The fault, as always, lies with Trumps opponents and the media. The unfair treatment to which Trump refers was likely this story in The Post, which showed that Ratcliffes claims about his experience were seriously exaggerated.
Ratcliffe had asserted that as a U.S. Attorney, I arrested over 300 illegal immigrants on a single day. But that was false: He didnt arrest them; the relevant operation ended up charging only 45 poultry workers with low-level offenses; and people involved in it could not recall Ratcliffe playing a central role.
This comes after stories showing that his claims to have tried terrorism cases were also inflated.
The office of DNI has only existed since 2005, and before Trumps election had been filled by people with long careers of service in the military, the intelligence world or both. President George W. Bush appointed Mike McConnell, a Navy vice admiral who had been the director of the National Security Agency. President Barack Obama appointed James R. Clapper Jr., an Air Force lieutenant general who had run the Defense Intelligence Agency.
But those claims of Ratcliffes work stoppin terrorists and ropin illegals were almost the entirety of his qualifications for the job, other than six months sitting on the House Intelligence Committee.
....
Paul Waldman is an opinion writer for the Plum Line blog. Follow https://twitter.com/paulwaldman1
Greg Sargent writes The Plum Line blog. He joined The Post in 2010, after stints at Talking Points Memo, New York Magazine and the New York Observer. Follow https://twitter.com/theplumlinegs
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Trump says Ratcliffe is no longer his pick for director of national intelligence [View all]
George II
Aug 2019
OP
Considering it's Trump, you get three guesses, and your first two don't count. n/t
woodsprite
Aug 2019
#2
The "LameStream Media" had nothing to do with it. Ratcliffe is UNQUALIFIED, plain and simple. nt
iluvtennis
Aug 2019
#20
Washington Post opinion: "Another Trump nominee goes down in flames. This is a big one."
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2019
#30