Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Nancy Pelosi Just Sent a Dire Warning About the Whistleblower Complaint to Trump [View all]area51
(12,079 posts)104. +1 n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
144 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nancy Pelosi Just Sent a Dire Warning About the Whistleblower Complaint to Trump [View all]
Fan of Da Bearse
Sep 2019
OP
I remember the times when democratic presidents attempted to send our troops to troubled...
usaf-vet
Sep 2019
#44
I, for one, DO NOT want to see our troops sent to defend the Saudis.
Haggis for Breakfast
Sep 2019
#59
dems are reticent because they and the media overvalue the trump base and that is
certainot
Sep 2019
#46
She wrote the stern letter in all capital letters, isn't that stern enough?
beachbumbob
Sep 2019
#89
Exactly. As if working with the Russians wasn't a "grave new chapter of lawlessness."
SMC22307
Sep 2019
#95
Look, I get you want him out of office.....most of us want that but what do you want Pelosi to do?
cstanleytech
Sep 2019
#101
Maybe she has the goods maybe she doesn't but what it comes down to is this.
cstanleytech
Sep 2019
#115
+1,000 It is like a Mayor demanding more dead bodies even when the police know who the
Maraya1969
Sep 2019
#139
Your thoughts seem to echo mine. I think they (House Dems) are approaching this whole thing with
japple
Sep 2019
#34
Sending American troops to Saudi Arabia is what turned Osama bin Laden against the US....
George II
Sep 2019
#78
All your points depend on clean elections. We have major problems with that if we are not
Amaryllis
Sep 2019
#105
A lot of people then didnt know enough to know those were stolen. Many people now know 2016 was
Amaryllis
Sep 2019
#141
Yes, i do agree with all that. Jsut dont think 2000 and 2004 were worse than 2016.
Amaryllis
Sep 2019
#143
Pelosi continually keeps moving the case against trump forward. trump's best hope is . . .
empedocles
Sep 2019
#3
You can't win an impeachment proceeding if you haven't built your case first.
George II
Sep 2019
#80
Well, if he truly cares about "the chilling effect on any future whistleblower"...
SMC22307
Sep 2019
#96
What exactly do you recommend she do? THey can't impeach him wiht the Rs owning the senate.
Amaryllis
Sep 2019
#106
What exactly do you recommend she do? THey can't impeach him wiht the Rs owning the senate.
Amaryllis
Sep 2019
#107
No, the House can impeach. It's only that the Senate must have a majority to remove.
YOHABLO
Sep 2019
#111
Thus far, it appears the Whistle-blower does not want to risk testifying without legal protection.
emmaverybo
Sep 2019
#109
Drip drip drip -- This is all part of turning public opinion so impeachment is tenable to the public
Politicub
Sep 2019
#75
This is embarrassing. Just for fun, which Dem would be Speaker of the House...
SMC22307
Sep 2019
#97
Let's get Bob Meuller on this ASAP! He's a rock ribbed PATRIOT, afraid of no man, who will uncover
BamaRefugee
Sep 2019
#110
THIS is saying NOTHING. "they will be entering a grave new chapter of lawlessness."
Maraya1969
Sep 2019
#127