Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court halts subpoena to Deutsche Bank for Trump records [View all]onenote
(42,531 posts)21. I've completely lost track of the number of times DUers with no understanding of the judicial
system have jumped to conclusions about stay requests such as this one.
This was completely predictable.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He must be afraid of being charged with tax evasion or fraud if they become public.
appleannie1
Dec 2019
#1
Loan Fraud is almost certain. Rachel Maddow already did a segment on Trump jacking up the value
okaawhatever
Dec 2019
#45
This was a routine, expected action. It says nothing at all about the ultimate outcome of the case.
tableturner
Dec 2019
#2
Let's see. This is the reformulated SCOTUS with Anthony Kennedy giving up his seat for Kavanaugh
erronis
Dec 2019
#6
I would hold off until we learn if the Court will even to first agree to hear the case and then on
cstanleytech
Dec 2019
#13
This is a messy ordeal. Nov. 19th the 55 y/o Deutsche Banker for Trump "committed suicide"
mysteryowl
Dec 2019
#18
This whole process by the turd of delay, delay, delay, trying to run out the clock...
not_the_one
Dec 2019
#19
Yeah, he delays, delays, delays, then screams about how long the investigations take.
Mc Mike
Dec 2019
#27
I've completely lost track of the number of times DUers with no understanding of the judicial
onenote
Dec 2019
#21
Actually any lawyer that didn't pursue this strategy would be committing malpractice
onenote
Dec 2019
#28
I said he is hiring a lawyer to do this. The question is who is paying the lawyer?
PuffedMica
Dec 2019
#36