Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Republicans muscle tax cut bill through House [View all]atreides1
(16,070 posts)21. But have you noticed
That the "liberal media" has so far failed to mention the other poison pills in this bill...the only part they're reporting on is the oil pipeline!
I guess the Repukes wouldn't want to piss off those federal employees who for some odd reason keep voting Republican, not to mention Seniors who seem to buy into the crap that the Repukes sell them!
I work for the federal government as well, but in a donated position so I don't fall under FERS, but my pay would still be frozen.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Wait a minute..what ever happen to the line item veto that Bush used over 100 times
INdemo
Dec 2011
#19
Bush never had a line item veto - Clinton did, but it was called unconstitutional
karynnj
Dec 2011
#22
I'm not worried about pipelines or payroll tax deductions (smoke and mirrors)
lib2DaBone
Dec 2011
#7
I read the bill on Thomas and that language is not there - can you link to the text you claim?
24601
Dec 2011
#10
Then he'll just have to sign it with a footnote exclusion clause, like Bush did,
cyberpj
Dec 2011
#35
Actually a lot of Nebraska Republicans don't want the pipeline as presently routed .
libinnyandia
Dec 2011
#24
And every other Republicans wants it built ASAP regardless of what states it goes through.
DCBob
Dec 2011
#28
Republicans payroll tax cuts pd for by increasing Medicare costs to seniors by $38bn
CarmanK
Dec 2011
#20