Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Cuomo Attacks Supreme Court, but Virus Ruling Is Warning to Governors [View all]mountain grammy
(26,598 posts)8. SCOTUS shouldn't have even taken this case..
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Cuomo Attacks Supreme Court, but Virus Ruling Is Warning to Governors [View all]
ancianita
Nov 2020
OP
Depends. Some churches admit that members can practice their knowledge of the difference
ancianita
Nov 2020
#3
Right? One would think that church leaders would require those, or at least a temperature
ancianita
Nov 2020
#7
He is. But it's a question of whose rights prevail -- those who are religious or everyone else's.
ancianita
Nov 2020
#11
Not a lawyer, I'd agree it's a state decision, but then the plaintiffs claim national standing.
ancianita
Nov 2020
#9
Harry Litman? He's an attorney, not a constitutional lawyer. Anyone can claim to
ancianita
Nov 2020
#15
gerrymandering is not at fault here. A state is going to have the same number of
yellowdogintexas
Nov 2020
#32
I watched some videos of those weddings and I couldn't believe how huge the crowds were
yellowdogintexas
Nov 2020
#33
Agree. According to Justice Roberts, belief numbers aren't as protected as human health numbers.
ancianita
Nov 2020
#16
One is moved to ask how they would rule over actions like those of Amon Bundy, David Koresh,
Ford_Prefect
Nov 2020
#19
God is not going to protect the people the SCOTUS has condemned to death in this decision
RVN VET71
Nov 2020
#21
Or until a big D Dem Congress moves to restructure it -- 13 justices for 13 federal districts.
ancianita
Nov 2020
#26
Nothing like a nice stuffy church as a prelude to a nice stuffy ventilator
bucolic_frolic
Nov 2020
#27