Latest Breaking News

bucolic_frolic

(43,042 posts)

27. Nothing like a nice stuffy church as a prelude to a nice stuffy ventilator

Reply to ancianita (Original post)

Fri Nov 27, 2020, 10:59 AM

Nov 2020

Everything and everyone has a destination. Get your tickets, step right up.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Cuomo Attacks Supreme Court, but Virus Ruling Is Warning to Governors [View all] ancianita Nov 2020 OP

What religions require you to go to church to practice them? sboatcar Nov 2020 #1

Depends. Some churches admit that members can practice their knowledge of the difference ancianita Nov 2020 #3

Biden speaks well on this issue.. ananda Nov 2020 #20

Yes Northern NY. Andy Knows from whence he speaks yankeepants Nov 2020 #2

How did they know who the asymptomatic person was. ancianita Nov 2020 #4

Perhaps a mandatory job-related test? Routine doc appointment? Pre-dental? yankeepants Nov 2020 #5

Right? One would think that church leaders would require those, or at least a temperature ancianita Nov 2020 #7

But temp checks don't screen out wnylib Nov 2020 #30

Definitely on separation of church and state! ananda Nov 2020 #23

As a New Yorker, I feel my Gov is doing an excellent job despite his yankeepants Nov 2020 #6

He is. But it's a question of whose rights prevail -- those who are religious or everyone else's. ancianita Nov 2020 #11

SCOTUS shouldn't have even taken this case.. mountain grammy Nov 2020 #8

Not a lawyer, I'd agree it's a state decision, but then the plaintiffs claim national standing. ancianita Nov 2020 #9

Wasn't there ANOTHER multi thousand person wedding of a rabbi's BigmanPigman Nov 2020 #10

Yes. And Cuomo publicly addressed this in a previous public briefing. ancianita Nov 2020 #12

I am steaming mad! BigmanPigman Nov 2020 #14

Harry Litman? He's an attorney, not a constitutional lawyer. Anyone can claim to ancianita Nov 2020 #15

Unless we end gerrymandering angrychair Nov 2020 #29

gerrymandering is not at fault here. A state is going to have the same number of yellowdogintexas Nov 2020 #32

I watched some videos of those weddings and I couldn't believe how huge the crowds were yellowdogintexas Nov 2020 #33

I never even knew these events took place BigmanPigman Nov 2020 #35

We live in a country where religion is elevated over science. Yavin4 Nov 2020 #13

Agree. According to Justice Roberts, belief numbers aren't as protected as human health numbers. ancianita Nov 2020 #16

And we can attribute it to Nixon's Southern Strategy. Initech Nov 2020 #17

This decision is contrary to the establishment clause nuxvomica Nov 2020 #18

One is moved to ask how they would rule over actions like those of Amon Bundy, David Koresh, Ford_Prefect Nov 2020 #19

God is not going to protect the people the SCOTUS has condemned to death in this decision RVN VET71 Nov 2020 #21

anyone else already sick of this "christo-Taliban on the Potomac" shit? bringthePaine Nov 2020 #22

I have been for years. roamer65 Nov 2020 #39

I only feel sorry for llashram Nov 2020 #24

The restrictions are temporary The Wizard Nov 2020 #25

Or until a big D Dem Congress moves to restructure it -- 13 justices for 13 federal districts. ancianita Nov 2020 #26

Nothing like a nice stuffy church as a prelude to a nice stuffy ventilator bucolic_frolic Nov 2020 #27

...or a nice stuffy coffin or cremation chamber. roamer65 Nov 2020 #38

what the SC just did azureblue Nov 2020 #28

It's now a Rethuglicon Supreme Court and they are a death cult . Many more will die because of their geretogo Nov 2020 #31

after biden is in office send in the police rdking647 Nov 2020 #34

I really hope this brings about the demonization of religious extremism. roamer65 Nov 2020 #36

King James Matt 18:20 Turbineguy Nov 2020 #37

What exactly are you trying to say. ancianita Nov 2020 #40

According to Jesus Turbineguy Nov 2020 #42

Shame on the NYT (and others) for misrepresenting the decision Ms. Toad Nov 2020 #41

Thank you for the clarification. ancianita Nov 2020 #43

This decision was about the collection plate not about freedom of speech. iemitsu Nov 2020 #44