Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)White House considers vehicle mileage tax to fund infrastructure, Buttigieg says [View all]
Source: CNBC
PUBLISHED FRI, MAR 26 202110:29 AM EDT UPDATED FRI, MAR 26 202110:54 AM EDT
Thomas Franck
@TOMWFRANCK
KEY POINTS
Pete Buttigieg, the transportation secretary, said that the White House is weighing a mileage tax and special bonds to fund infrastructure.
He argued that President Joe Bidens forthcoming plans to rebuild U.S. roads, bridges and waterways would lead to a net gain for the U.S. taxpayer.
Im hearing a lot of appetite to make sure that there are sustainable funding streams, Buttigieg said. A mileage tax shows a lot of promise.
Pete Buttigieg, the transportation secretary, said Friday morning that the White House is weighing a variety of ways to finance whats expected to be its multitrillion-dollar infrastructure proposals.
Buttigieg, who spoke with CNBCs Kayla Tausche, also argued that President Joe Bidens forthcoming plans to rebuild U.S. roads, bridges and waterways would lead to a net gain for the U.S. taxpayer and not a net outlay.
When you think about infrastructure, its a classic example of the kind of investment that has a return on that investment, he said. Thats one of many reasons why we think this is so important. This is a jobs vision as much as it is an infrastructure vision, a climate vision, and more.
He also weighed in on several potential revenue-generating options to fund the project. He spoke fondly of a mileage levy, which would tax travelers based on how far they travel instead of on how much gasoline they consume.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/26/buttigieg-says-white-house-is-weighing-mileage-levy-to-fund-infrastructure.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
96 replies, 5396 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House considers vehicle mileage tax to fund infrastructure, Buttigieg says [View all]
DonViejo
Mar 2021
OP
For many areas of the country that will be a regressive tax on those least able to afford it
hlthe2b
Mar 2021
#1
Exactly. And how will it be structured - it's 45 miles from my home in San Jose to my job in
iluvtennis
Mar 2021
#32
You would only think that if you lived on the East Coast & had no clue of the distances in the West
hlthe2b
Mar 2021
#42
I don't know why there's a surprise. Road infrastructure has been partly paid through fuel tax ...
JustABozoOnThisBus
Mar 2021
#46
No, it is a regressive tax that will hurt the already struggling middle class and the poor.
Demsrule86
Mar 2021
#89
The 1% Has 50 Trillion They Basically Stole By Using A Corrupt System That Has The Poor
DanieRains
Mar 2021
#14
I know you're anti-everything Bernie, but in this case, as chairman of the budget committee
Fiendish Thingy
Mar 2021
#15
That's not true. I haven't attacked you personally... please refrain from doing that to me.
NurseJackie
Mar 2021
#20
This is something the SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION and PRESIDENT are considering.
George II
Mar 2021
#43
It's a binary view of how the government raises money to do the things that governments must do.
NurseJackie
Mar 2021
#57
How is this already being decried as "taxing the poor"? Do you know details about it that even....
George II
Mar 2021
#44
It is based on a consumption tax, which is by definition a regressive tax.
AZLD4Candidate
Mar 2021
#47
Sales taxes are all regressive. Consumption taxes usually can't also be claimed on a federal
AZLD4Candidate
Mar 2021
#83
A really bad idea! Regressive, hurts those most in need and penalizes those who need a car to work.
machoneman
Mar 2021
#8
From what little I've seen about this (it's still in the "consideration" stage) I don't think....
George II
Mar 2021
#45
Yeah I expect it was a "trial balloon" that was thrown out there to gauge the sentiment
BumRushDaShow
Mar 2021
#52
Unfortunately in most states roads have been saturated with respect to tolls, and it's not...
George II
Mar 2021
#56
It makes perfectly good sense when it comes to Electric Vehicles that pay no gas-tax...
NurseJackie
Mar 2021
#10
That's a great way to encourage tire theft and dumping the old ones by the side of the road. NT
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2021
#35
Order the states to make everyone to install GPS tracking in order to renew plates.
MichMan
Mar 2021
#75
"tax travelers based on how far they travel instead of on how much gasoline they consume"
speak easy
Mar 2021
#85
That is a very very bad idea...regressive tax and will get us tossed out in 22.
Demsrule86
Mar 2021
#88