Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(5,061 posts)

3. Justice Quack Quack Scalia didn't have to recuse himself in his buddy's case, so why should she?

Mon Apr 26, 2021, 09:09 PM

Apr 2021

I'm sure Kegs won't either. It's the Republican way.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Good luck. Conservative justices are above the law, donchaknow. JudyM Apr 2021 #1

Above the law and beneath contempt RVN VET71 Apr 2021 #13

True, but can you shame the shameless? RVN VET71 Apr 2021 #19

This message was self-deleted by its author JudyM Apr 2021 #2

Both of them strict constructionists. In his case just... brush Apr 2021 #20

No she can't Polybius Apr 2021 #5

Grounds to impeach. Of course, it won't go anywhere. LiberalFighter Apr 2021 #6

Solution: Nominate 4 judges to expand SC to 13 instead of 9. Justice matters. Apr 2021 #8

I'd like to see the number 6 RVN VET71 Apr 2021 #14

And who paid off all of Kavanaugh's debts just before his confirmation? Midnight Writer Apr 2021 #9

She is a pill. Grimelle Apr 2021 #12

This is a list from 2016. former9thward Apr 2021 #17

A few times, though there are some obvious failures to recuse. Calista241 Apr 2021 #18