Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,325 posts)
5. Not necessarily. If a family member has dna on file they can get a partial match hit on them.
Sat May 1, 2021, 10:25 AM
May 2021

Once they identify a familial hit they have it narrowed down to a relatively small list of possibles. Now do the detective work to exclude people - deceased, not living in the area, etc.

Once they identify a suspect they can obtain DNA either voluntarily, by court order, or surreptitiously (follow the suspect and collect soft drink cups etc.)


The way authorities caught The Golden State Killer was nothing short of amazing



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_James_DeAngelo#Investigation

On June 15, 2016, the FBI released further information related to the crimes, including new composite sketches and crime details;[130] a $50,000 reward was also announced.[165] The initiative included a national database to support law enforcement's investigating of the crimes and to handle tips and information.[166] Eventually, "through the use of genetic genealogy searching on GEDmatch, investigators identified distant relatives of DeAngelo — including family members directly related to his great-great-great-great grandfather dating back to the 1800s. Based on this information, investigators built about 25 different family trees. The tree that eventually linked to [DeAngelo] alone contained approximately 1,000 people. Over the course of a few months, investigators used other clues like age, sex, and place of residence to rule out suspects populating these trees, eliminating suspects one by one until only DeAngelo remained."[16]
During the investigation, several people were considered and later eliminated as suspects:
Brett Glasby, from Goleta, was considered a suspect by Santa Barbara County investigators. He was murdered in Mexico in 1982, before the murder of Janelle Cruz; this eliminated him as a suspect.[167]
Paul "Cornfed" Schneider, a high-ranking member of the Aryan Brotherhood, was living in Orange County when the Harringtons, Manuela Witthuhn, and Janelle Cruz were killed. A DNA test cleared him in the 1990s.[168][169]
Joe Alsip, a friend and business partner of the victim Lyman Smith. Alsip's pastor said that Alsip had confessed to him during a family-counseling session. Alsip was arraigned for the Smith murders in 1982, but the charges were later dropped,[170][171] and his innocence was confirmed by DNA testing in 1997.[172]
DNA testing and wide use of computers to evaluate evidence is the answer as to why this happened. Stuart G May 2021 #1
The guy had to have DNA in some databank somewhere jimfields33 May 2021 #2
Or did they have tips about him and get DNA upon his arrest? Bengus81 May 2021 #3
Good question. jimfields33 May 2021 #4
Not necessarily. If a family member has dna on file they can get a partial match hit on them. Hassin Bin Sober May 2021 #5
That was truly amazing! Bluepinky May 2021 #6
I think I read somewhere they are trying the same technique for the Zodiac killer. Hassin Bin Sober May 2021 #10
Yeah, he should be. Bluepinky May 2021 #18
These "find your family history" genealogy sites make it easier to solve these cold cases. n/t Yavin4 May 2021 #9
It''s actually alot of work, unless researchers get lucky LeftInTX May 2021 #19
No, they could have tracked him through familial DNA, like they did for Golden State Killer greenjar_01 May 2021 #7
Or a relative had DNA in a databank. Midnight Writer May 2021 #8
Many people that thought they got away with murder/rape because decades have passed alphafemale May 2021 #12
Let me guess.... He did this when he was 23 and has lived a full life....but alphafemale May 2021 #11
I'll save that attitude for the conviction if it happens AZLD4Candidate May 2021 #13
DNA does not lie. alphafemale May 2021 #14
I agree, but I am not an "arrest means guilt" person. That's why there are trials. AZLD4Candidate May 2021 #15
And then he has had most of his life since slaughtering that helpless old woman. alphafemale May 2021 #16
Did I say "mercy?" All I said was I will reserve my call for blood until after conviction. AZLD4Candidate May 2021 #17
You don't have "old man bones" at 64. colorado_ufo May 2021 #20
They are going to try everything. alphafemale May 2021 #21
It's more likely that this guy has been a repeat offender over the years... joshcryer May 2021 #22
Like the Golden State Killer turned out to be a cop while he was terrorizing and killing. alphafemale May 2021 #23
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Man Arrested in 1980 Slay...»Reply #5