Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Prof. Toru Tanaka

(1,921 posts)
66. Agreed and it should be an administrative discharge.
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 09:56 AM
Mar 2022


I believe under "other than honorable conditions" would cover that.
Clarence... JoeOtterbein Mar 2022 #1
I was about to ask Jarqui Mar 2022 #31
Pressure needs to be applied to this disgusting pig to get him to resign...retire...whatever ... Hulk Mar 2022 #60
He can't handle the pressure and stress... raising2moredems Mar 2022 #69
The Roberts Kangaroo Kourt. The Unmitigated Gall Mar 2022 #2
Roberts voted with the majority. Martin68 Mar 2022 #49
Speaking in general terms. The Unmitigated Gall Mar 2022 #53
Sounds to me Court reached the right decision. Hoyt Mar 2022 #3
It should have been unanimous Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2022 #5
Probably. But there are times when troops need to say, No. Would Hoyt Mar 2022 #9
A person who does not wish to take the vax is free vanlassie Mar 2022 #33
I agree 100%, vanlassie. Prof. Toru Tanaka Mar 2022 #55
But they're all, each and every one, heros. Right? jaxexpat Mar 2022 #61
at the very least Blackjackdavey Mar 2022 #74
They asked for Religious Exemptions to getting vaccinated kwijybo Mar 2022 #38
There are times atreides1 Mar 2022 #56
There is no such thing in the military as an "illegal order." Haggis 4 Breakfast Mar 2022 #68
And Thomas should have recused. soldierant Mar 2022 #58
How does a case like that even get to SCOTUS? brush Mar 2022 #11
However, there are times that troops need to say "No, MFer"-- William Calley's massacre for ex. Hoyt Mar 2022 #12
Troops are obligated to refuse an illegal order. wnylib Mar 2022 #13
Well, I'm fully vaxxed and boosted, but many rubes -- for whatever reason -- do question whether Hoyt Mar 2022 #16
I wasn't responding to the vaccine order. wnylib Mar 2022 #22
Well, I think the Court had to rule on whether mandated vaccines are legal. I think so, but as I Hoyt Mar 2022 #25
I hate to keep having to say this, but COL Mustard Mar 2022 #40
Agreed and it should be an administrative discharge. Prof. Toru Tanaka Mar 2022 #66
I doubt many troops are aware of that obligation to refuse an illegal order 70sEraVet Mar 2022 #41
Uh...no, you are wrong... radicalleft Mar 2022 #45
Genuinely glad to know I'm wrong. 70sEraVet Mar 2022 #46
Of course that's true. COL Mustard Mar 2022 #67
Come on. Taking vaccines to insure military readiness is not an illegal order. brush Mar 2022 #21
If trump told me to take a vaccine, I'd darn sure question its efficacy. Biden I trust. Hoyt Mar 2022 #27
It's neither Biden or trump. It's commanding officers and... brush Mar 2022 #73
Washington knew that! He lost half the expeditionary force... TreasonousBastard Mar 2022 #72
This will keep things simpler. Karadeniz Mar 2022 #4
KR! too bad for the Dissenters.. that Cha Mar 2022 #6
Good, this could have carried over to other orders. Should've been unanimous. Nt Baked Potato Mar 2022 #7
I think the dissenters were strategic. plimsoll Mar 2022 #8
Saw the headline and thought "Gotta be The Onion!" Talitha Mar 2022 #10
Same SledDriver Mar 2022 #20
Exactly what I thought. JHC. Evolve Dammit Mar 2022 #39
I have to admit--I did not know what to think. riversedge Mar 2022 #51
Partisan? Fuck! The Supreme Court is 3/7ths Russian. dchill Mar 2022 #14
Yet the tfg judges voted for Biden ... weird, interesting ... fierywoman Mar 2022 #15
That is one bright spot, the SC held firm on trump's BS. Hoyt Mar 2022 #17
Not necessarily good speak easy Mar 2022 #19
My reading was, "Sorry, bud, you lost, suck it up." Seems like the ruled that over 25 times. Hoyt Mar 2022 #23
ok. ty speak easy Mar 2022 #29
They've ruled against trump on more than one occasion. oldsoftie Mar 2022 #44
gorsuch dissented. niyad Mar 2022 #36
I guessed 'right'. Thomas and Alito are garbage. speak easy Mar 2022 #18
Those three are saying "religious liberty" outweighs the very structure of our gov't NullTuples Mar 2022 #24
I'm still waiting for someone to show me the part of the Bible that covers vaccines. nt oldsoftie Mar 2022 #43
The RCC's argument was that they used cells made from stem cells for developing the vaxxes NullTuples Mar 2022 #62
But from what I understand, Pfizer & Moderna did NOT use any aborted fetal cells oldsoftie Mar 2022 #64
There you go, being all logical again... NullTuples Mar 2022 #70
I guess I really need to work on that! oldsoftie Mar 2022 #71
Case should never have been in the civilian courts in the first place and cstanleytech Mar 2022 #26
Isn't Clarence in the hospital? karin_sj Mar 2022 #28
He was released. Also, due to COVID they do more remote meetting, voting now. L. Coyote Mar 2022 #30
I was hoping he'd be released COL Mustard Mar 2022 #52
Interesting how in Alito's dissent Aviation Pro Mar 2022 #32
I thought this was The Onion. nt Trueblue Texan Mar 2022 #34
Interesting.... paleotn Mar 2022 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author MustLoveBeagles Mar 2022 #37
What a clickbait headline. This was a "religious rights" case. Which they shouldn't win oldsoftie Mar 2022 #42
Yeah, I agree with NOT allowing vaccine exemptions Farmer-Rick Mar 2022 #50
I agree. And why is no one ever asked "what part of your religion covers vaccines?" oldsoftie Mar 2022 #54
Exactly Farmer-Rick Mar 2022 #59
The dissenters should be ejected from the court they clearly are irrational and should not be.... usaf-vet Mar 2022 #47
The 3 justices who voted against this are clearly not fit to sit on the Supreme Court because they Martin68 Mar 2022 #48
I'm more surprised that Kavanaugh and Barrett ruled with the majority. ificandream Mar 2022 #57
The decision by the court is not what the OP headline suggests. former9thward Mar 2022 #63
did the 3 justicesbweight in on who is the CIC? Dan Mar 2022 #65
A win is a win The Grand Illuminist Mar 2022 #75
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The Supreme Court rules t...»Reply #66