Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)DOJ rebuffs Democrats' request for inventory of Trump's boxes [View all]
Source: Washington Post
The Justice Department this week rebuffed a request from the House Oversight Committee for more details about the 15 boxes of White House records that former president Donald Trump improperly removed to Mar-a-Lago, hinting in a letter that an ongoing investigation prevents the department from doing so.
In the letter addressed to Chairwoman Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.), and reviewed by The Washington Post, acting assistant attorney general Peter Hyun writes that after the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) referred concerns about whether such materials had been properly handled to the Justice Department earlier this year, officials asked the archives not to share information related to the records taken to Trumps estate in Palm Beach, Fla.
The Post reported last week that the Justice Department has begun taking steps to investigate the former presidents removal of the records, some of which were classified and labeled top secret. Maloney had accused the department of obstructing her committees investigation by preventing NARAs from handing over a detailed inventory of the boxes contents.
Advertisement
In the letter sent this week, Hyun writes that while the Justice Department has great respect for the committees oversight authority, the Department previously asked NARA not to share or otherwise disclose to others information relating to this matter in order to protect the integrity of our ongoing work.
In the letter addressed to Chairwoman Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.), and reviewed by The Washington Post, acting assistant attorney general Peter Hyun writes that after the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) referred concerns about whether such materials had been properly handled to the Justice Department earlier this year, officials asked the archives not to share information related to the records taken to Trumps estate in Palm Beach, Fla.
The Post reported last week that the Justice Department has begun taking steps to investigate the former presidents removal of the records, some of which were classified and labeled top secret. Maloney had accused the department of obstructing her committees investigation by preventing NARAs from handing over a detailed inventory of the boxes contents.
Advertisement
In the letter sent this week, Hyun writes that while the Justice Department has great respect for the committees oversight authority, the Department previously asked NARA not to share or otherwise disclose to others information relating to this matter in order to protect the integrity of our ongoing work.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/04/12/trump-boxes-records-top-secret-doj
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
64 replies, 3566 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They're busy looking at the unopened boxes and thinking important thoughts about them. They
Scrivener7
Apr 2022
#1
I think all your questions are the same questions the DOJ is investigating
Fiendish Thingy
Apr 2022
#7
One of the interesting things about investigations is they don't often ask witnesses questions
Fiendish Thingy
Apr 2022
#13
i'd rather someone be put in jail for smuggling top secret files out of the white house
orleans
Apr 2022
#23
Even if the documents contain no evidence of crimes, removing them is a crime
Fiendish Thingy
Apr 2022
#15
If it's highly classified, then who on Maloney's committee actually has the clearance to be privy to
Novara
Apr 2022
#22
I don't like this. Not a damned bit. The DOJ is owned by the 6 of the 6/3 USSC.
jaxexpat
Apr 2022
#20
"Rebuffs"?? BS. DOJ's had a full plate since it was able to constitute itself a year and a month ago
ancianita
Apr 2022
#31
Thanks for the correction. The same holds true for Oversight in terms of jurisdiction.
ancianita
Apr 2022
#52
Maybe if we had some assurance that action was happening to hold TFG accountable for ANYTHING...
Grasswire2
Apr 2022
#38
I still don't get the point. The Oversight Committee can't hold Trump accountable either
Raven123
Apr 2022
#46
That's a clear sign that the boxes contain material that are well above the average Congressperson's
Martin68
Apr 2022
#56