Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kid Berwyn

(14,876 posts)
26. Reactor 3 ran plutonium enriched fuel.
Sat May 21, 2022, 12:15 AM
May 2022


Japan’s Misguided Plutonium Policy

As for what’s getting dumped into the sea that Japan has admitted to:



New paper addresses the mix of contaminants in Fukushima wastewater

August 6, 2020

Nearly 10 years after the Tohoku-oki earthquake and tsunami devastated Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant and triggered an unprecedented release radioactivity into the ocean, radiation levels have fallen to safe levels in all but the waters closest to the shuttered power plant. Today, fish and other seafood caught in waters beyond all but a limited region have been found to be well within Japan’s strict limits for radioactive contamination, but a new hazard exists and is growing every day in the number of storage tanks on land surrounding the power plant that hold contaminated wastewater. An article published August 7 in the journal Science takes a look at some of the many radioactive elements contained in the tanks and suggests that more needs to be done to understand the potential risks of releasing wastewater from the tanks into the ocean.

We’ve watched over the past nine-plus years as the levels of radioactive cesium have declined in seawater and in marine life in the Pacific,” said Ken Buesseler, a marine chemist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and author of the new paper. “But there are quite a few radioactive contaminants still in those tanks that we need to think about, some of which that were not seen in large amounts in 2011, but most importantly, they don’t all act the same in the ocean.”

Since 2011, Buesseler has been studying the spread of radiation from Fukushima into and across the Pacific. In June of that year, he mobilized a team of scientists to conduct the first international research cruise to study the early pathways that cesium-134 and -137, two radioactive isotopes of cesium produced in reactors, were taking as they entered the powerful Kuroshio Current off the coast of Japan. He has also built a network of citizen scientists in the U.S. and Canada who have helped monitor the arrival and movement of radioactive material on the Pacific coast of North America.

Now, he is more concerned about the more than 1,000 tanks on the grounds of the power plant filling with ground water and cooling water that have become contaminated through contact with the reactors and their containment buildings. Sophisticated cleaning processes have been able to remove many radioactive isotopes and efforts to divert groundwater flows around the reactors have greatly reduced the amount of contaminated water being collected to less than 200 metric tons per day, but some estimates see the tanks being filled in the near future, leading some Japanese officials to suggest treated water should be released into the ocean to free up space for more wastewater.

One of the radioactive isotopes that remains at the highest levels in the treated water and would be released is tritium, an isotope of hydrogen is almost impossible to remove, as it becomes part of the water molecule itself. However, tritium has a relatively short half-life, which measures the rate of decay of an isotope; is not absorbed as easily by marine life or seafloor sediments, and produces beta particles, which is not as damaging to living tissue as other forms of radiation. Isotopes that remain in the treated wastewater include carbon-14, cobalt-60, and strontium-90. These and the other isotopes that remain, which were only revealed in 2018, all take much longer to decay and have much greater affinities for seafloor sediments and marine organisms like fish, which means they could be potentially hazardous to humans and the environment for much longer and in more complex ways than tritium.

Continues…

https://www.whoi.edu/press-room/news-release/fukushima-tank-contaminants/



Those are the facts.
Once again earthlings, there is no safe disposal of this waste. We will all suffer for any releases. Evolve Dammit May 2022 #1
Bullshit. NNadir May 2022 #7
Not Bullshit. Magoo48 May 2022 #14
Anyone who makes a statement that highly diluted tritium is... NNadir May 2022 #15
Given that we can measure incredibly small increases of radioactive material NickB79 May 2022 #21
so what is a "safe level" of radiation? Has it been defined? Evolve Dammit May 2022 #23
that is a lot of big water tanks lapfog_1 May 2022 #2
The plan they've been pushing for years is just to give up containing the water NullTuples May 2022 #9
Why can't the same water be reused for cooling? Owl May 2022 #16
The tsunami destroyed the plant's cooling systems, causing the meltdown of three reactors. Lasher May 2022 #3
It wasn't the force of the tsumani; it was putting the emergency generators in the basement NullTuples May 2022 #10
No meaningful difference. Lasher May 2022 #17
My point is the location wasn't the problem; minimizing cost was the problem NullTuples May 2022 #18
So the location wasn't a problem until they made it so by eliminating the hill. Lasher May 2022 #22
Approved! What other choice do they have? keithbvadu2 May 2022 #4
Tritium removal systems are in use elsewhere; TEPCO/Japan is taking the cheaper route NullTuples May 2022 #19
Send it on down to Mar a Lardo Blue Owl May 2022 #5
Good. It's long been a wasteful paean to ignorance to spend the money to store it. NNadir May 2022 #6
What's a little plutonium among friends? Kid Berwyn May 2022 #24
One of the interesting things about anti-nukes is how willing they are to display ignorance. NNadir May 2022 #25
Reactor 3 ran plutonium enriched fuel. Kid Berwyn May 2022 #26
Yeah, and what? NNadir May 2022 #27
Not with TEPCO dumping nuclear waste into the Pacific Ocean. Kid Berwyn May 2022 #28
I made myself clear. It is a waste of time to discuss facts with anti-nukes... NNadir May 2022 #29
You didn't educate anyone. Kid Berwyn May 2022 #30
Japan may have approved those plans, Bayard May 2022 #8
wow messed up rockfordfile May 2022 #11
Worse shit comes out of any coal power plant in normal operation. hunter May 2022 #13
Yikes. 2naSalit May 2022 #12
Good. That will go a long way to protect ocean life NickB79 May 2022 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Japan OKs plan to release...»Reply #26