Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

calimary

(81,053 posts)

32. From your keyboard to God's screen.

Reply to BlueIdaho (Reply #31)

Tue May 31, 2022, 02:16 PM

May 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sussmann, who worked for Clinton, acquitted of lying to FBI in 2016 [View all] Yonnie3 May 2022 OP

Can Sussman sue? Midnight Writer May 2022 #1

No, probably not. Malicious prosecution is a tough case to prove, Ocelot II May 2022 #7

Can John Durham now be removed? Budi May 2022 #2

I don't know, but it's clear now Mr.Bill May 2022 #8

Biden knew the only way to play hardball with this mob style revenge,is to simply keep handing them. Budi May 2022 #25

Apparently it would have to be a "for cause" removal by Garland BumRushDaShow May 2022 #9

Well this prosecution should be enough to get him fired. It was shit and they made Bev54 May 2022 #15

The timing might end up being tied to BumRushDaShow May 2022 #23

There is at least one more charged and I thought 2 but can only find this one. Bev54 May 2022 #26

I literally just found an article that mentioned a 2nd person and posted it BumRushDaShow May 2022 #29

K & R! 50 Shades Of Blue May 2022 #3

Finally an example of a witch hunt. gab13by13 May 2022 #4

I do believe this whole sham of an investigation and lawsuit was used to Bev54 May 2022 #16

"This was a distraction away from the Trump tower server connected to Alfa Bank in Russia." Yup! Botany May 2022 #19

Good news. sinkingfeeling May 2022 #5

Yes, the DOJ should now remove Durham STAT! He'll now lose the 2nd trial anyway. machoneman May 2022 #6

I called my 91-year-old right-wing mom this morning to see how she is doing, deurbano May 2022 #14

... mcar May 2022 #10

This was a very weak case LetMyPeopleVote May 2022 #11

Rt🤷‍♂️💖TY.. Perfect! Cha May 2022 #36

So is this the end of what Durham was working on TlalocW May 2022 #12

From the OP Lasher May 2022 #27

Well. Ok. kairos12 May 2022 #13

A pardon would be thrilling to them. StevieM May 2022 #17

I guess Durham was arguing.... Mustellus May 2022 #18

Well there goes the Reich-wing's raging boner! Along with Durham's "valid reasons." Grins May 2022 #20

Wonder how much this rabbit hole cost the taxpayers? djacq May 2022 #21

As of last December, it was almost $4 million BumRushDaShow May 2022 #24

And Sussman. Something like this could financially ruin most people. Scrivener7 May 2022 #37

Baseless accusation because the Fed interviewer already knew Sussman worked for Clinton campaign wishstar May 2022 #22

Yes. Both can be true exboyfil May 2022 #30

Recommended. H2O Man May 2022 #28

Stick a fork in Durham BlueIdaho May 2022 #31

From your keyboard to God's screen. calimary May 2022 #32

In the real world his career would be damaged. Mr.Bill May 2022 #33

Well, he's just incompetent enough BlueIdaho May 2022 #34

TY for the Gift, Yonnie! Cha May 2022 #35

Durham now joins Benghazi and Whitewater on the Clinton conspiracy trash heap Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2022 #38