Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court says N.Y. gun law is too restrictive, violates right to carry guns outside home [View all]Marthe48
(16,935 posts)48. I can see NY defying the court
and a monumental battle about states' rights vs federal laws. If such a thing happened, the defense for NY could bring in the questionable actions that got incompetents and criminals seated on the highest court of the land. I don't think NY would win, but I would like to see the case used to highlight the illegality of those 3 judges and the compromised position of the 4th. The current majority should bow their corrupt heads in shame, but they have no shame. And that's another reason I hate them. I always loved the honor of the people seated on the court and having those venal pukes besmirching it pisses me off entirely.
I should stop ranting for the day. I'm planning to watch the hearings, probably need to do some deep breathing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court says N.Y. gun law is too restrictive, violates right to carry guns outside home [View all]
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2022
OP
I expect the Court is going to pull a lot of bad decisions out of their ass this session. n/t
malthaussen
Jun 2022
#9
The biggest quirk in NY law was the NYC required an approved license for the city
Historic NY
Jun 2022
#10
Biden would never be so irresponsible as to sanction the concept of "Screw the Supreme Court"
Midwestern Democrat
Jun 2022
#63
While a Democratic House passes a bill to increase SC's personal security
BeyondGeography
Jun 2022
#16
All I know is, I don't want to hear these assholes screaming that the govt. wants their damn guns.
AngryOldDem
Jun 2022
#21
Honestly I think we should strike Marbury v. Madison down by EO and see what they try to do about it
bucolic_frolic
Jun 2022
#23
I'm confused. When it serves the whackadoodles desires the SCOTUS sides with "states rights" - when
NoMoreRepugs
Jun 2022
#52
Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence in Bruen is a perfect example of what I call a "pivotal concurrence"
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2022
#57
A question i've ALWAYS had here is the courts are full steam ahead for gun freedoms, BUT
bluestarone
Jun 2022
#61