Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Dearie asks Trump lawyers whether they believe FBI lied about seized documents [View all]BumRushDaShow
(128,506 posts)58. You're welcome!
The last time something like this got "in the news" was when Michael Cohen had a Special Master assigned to go through the items collected from his apartment, office, and a hotel room he was using.
A retired federal judge ruled that less than 0.2% of all the Michael Cohen documents are privileged
Allan Smith
Aug 16, 2018, 6:39 PM
(snip)
The special master overseeing the document review in the federal investigation into Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump's former longtime lawyer, has ruled that roughly 0.2% of the more than 4 million documents seized by the FBI from the attorney are covered by attorney-client privilege.
Barbara Jones, a retired federal judge appointed to oversee the review, wrote in her final report to US District Judge Kimba Wood on Thursday that nearly 7,500 documents were either privileged, highly personal, or partially privileged. Cohen claimed privilege over slightly more than 12,000 of the 4 million-plus documents, and is not challenging any of Jones's rulings with Wood.
In a filing that was posted shortly after Jones's final report, Wood wrote that the parties must file any objections to Jones's determinations to the court by Friday evening.
Cohen is the focus of a criminal investigation in the Southern District of New York into whether he violated campaign-finance laws, committed bank fraud or wire fraud, engaged in illegal lobbying, or participated in other crimes. The FBI raided Cohen's home, hotel room, and office in April, seizing more than 4 million documents from Trump's longtime lawyer.
(snip)
https://www.businessinsider.com/special-master-rules-few-michael-cohen-documents-privileged-2018-8
Allan Smith
Aug 16, 2018, 6:39 PM
(snip)
The special master overseeing the document review in the federal investigation into Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump's former longtime lawyer, has ruled that roughly 0.2% of the more than 4 million documents seized by the FBI from the attorney are covered by attorney-client privilege.
Barbara Jones, a retired federal judge appointed to oversee the review, wrote in her final report to US District Judge Kimba Wood on Thursday that nearly 7,500 documents were either privileged, highly personal, or partially privileged. Cohen claimed privilege over slightly more than 12,000 of the 4 million-plus documents, and is not challenging any of Jones's rulings with Wood.
In a filing that was posted shortly after Jones's final report, Wood wrote that the parties must file any objections to Jones's determinations to the court by Friday evening.
Cohen is the focus of a criminal investigation in the Southern District of New York into whether he violated campaign-finance laws, committed bank fraud or wire fraud, engaged in illegal lobbying, or participated in other crimes. The FBI raided Cohen's home, hotel room, and office in April, seizing more than 4 million documents from Trump's longtime lawyer.
(snip)
https://www.businessinsider.com/special-master-rules-few-michael-cohen-documents-privileged-2018-8
However little of that process ever got dissected in the media like what is going on right now!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Dearie asks Trump lawyers whether they believe FBI lied about seized documents [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Sep 2022
OP
And it's lucky for us that he IS handling these questions as the Special Master
FakeNoose
Sep 2022
#28
Trump is afraid he will be convicted on the law he made into a felony.So he is crying not classified
Walleye
Sep 2022
#4
Big strong man came up with tears streaming down his face and said, sir you can declassify anything
Walleye
Sep 2022
#37
Some of those docs are said to be so sensitive, they cannot be put on any list
SheltieLover
Sep 2022
#29
Maybe that's what they will argue? That they had no idea what was in the boxes
Laura PourMeADrink
Sep 2022
#44
Trumps response, and the response his lawyers are willing to give to the court, will be two differen
ZonkerHarris
Sep 2022
#40
Trump and his lawyers have no idea if the Gubmint's inventory is accurate or not.
maxsolomon
Sep 2022
#25
Can a judge legally ask that question of a lawyer? Turn the lawyer into a character witness?
JustABozoOnThisBus
Sep 2022
#33