Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 'Decisions are imminent' on charges in Trump's effort to overturn 2020 election in Georgia [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(48,955 posts)30. You mischaracterize me again
I wrote nothing that could be construed as "what did I do?".
I know what I did. I picked up the poster's response to the OP and called that response essentially nonsense. If people think that is "browbeating" and are disturbed by condescension, what are they doing on public forums?
You can call it browbeating if you like, but the poster did not deal with the issue and neither are you. You and they seem more interested in attacking my writing than the points.
I wrote:
As to your "legal question", even tRump has appealed all the way to the Supreme Court and lost. So, no, your premise is bogus. Just because appeals all the way to the SC are possible does NOT make it FUTILE.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Decisions are imminent' on charges in Trump's effort to overturn 2020 election in Georgia [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2023
OP
"has recommended multiple indictments and her decision on whether to bring charges is imminent."
Botany
Jan 2023
#1
Your advice boils down to: Give up, hand the keys to the Authoritarians, go home. No, no, no. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#9
You called the effort futile. Are you now saying you routinely advise people to do futile things?
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#15
Yes. But nonsense needs to be stepped on or it propagates. . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#18
I'm not gatekeeping. Nothing I posted said they can't post. I call it nonsense. Poster doesn't
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#24
"Your opinion carries absolutely no more weight". You are correct. But you contradict yourself
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#26
Neither was I issuing a formal treatise. I don't have to and neither do they. :eyes:
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#31
I shared my opinion of the poster's opinion. That's debate. I scolded their opinion for nonsense
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#45
Read the OP. They must be kept sealed because charging decisions are being made. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#10
She has to present the case(s) to a regular Grand Jury and ask them to vote to indict.
Justice matters.
Jan 2023
#16
A President tried to overturn an election and he gets fined? If anyone is going
Scrivener7
Jan 2023
#42
Ditto. Make it imminent as in today. Im dyin' from old age having to wait here
onetexan
Jan 2023
#33