Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump attorney wants to propose a 'counter-judgment' in $355M civil fraud case: court docs [View all]moniss
(7,495 posts)false statement with the court. His client was not deprived from speaking both in court and out prior to the ruling. His client spoke outside the court ad nauseum and also inside the court. He was told to keep his comments in court to the evidence presented in this phase concerning levying for damages and in what amount. He instead chose to go on a rant alleging mistreatment by the court and those in government. That was his chance to give evidence to mitigate the dollar amounts and all along he had the opportunity to propose a settlement amount with the AG for presentation to Engoron. Instead he chose to occupy his time with unfounded personal attacks on the AG, Judge Engoron, court personnel and others. There was no deprivation. That is a clear lie by the defense attorney because it cannot be said to be made with a good faith belief as to truthfulness.
Edit history
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):