Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Gavin Newsom breaks with Democrats on trans athletes in sports [View all]TexasBushwhacker
(20,875 posts)50. It's complicated
A trans female who begins tradition BEFORE puberty with estrogen injections and male hormone blockers, will never get the muscle strength and bone density that gives cis males their advantage over females. I fully agree that it's inappropriate for someone who transitioned male to female AFTER puberty, because they could have some of that extra strength and bone density.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

A creep? No way. It was just one thing discussed. There is a fairness issue in terms or strength and aerobic capacity.
brush
Mar 6
#8
You are right that it is unclear. It is clear that he thinks transwomen competing in women's sports is 'unfair'
kelly1mm
Mar 6
#5
You may not get flamed as according to recent surveys a majority of Democrats agree with your and Gov
kelly1mm
Mar 6
#7
What the fuck is there to flame? It is a reasonable concern. I am all fucking for Transgender Rights.
SoFlaBro
Mar 6
#29
I have not bought into propaganda. There is a fairness issue as transgenders have an aerobid...
brush
Mar 6
#15
Brittney griner is the biggest , tallest, strongest female athlete I can think of and
questionseverything
Mar 6
#19
Yep! Only so many 80/20 issues you can be on the wrong side of and be a viable candidate nationally. nt
kelly1mm
Mar 6
#12
In the article Gov Newsom thinks it is an issue that hurt VP Harris's Presidential campaign to the extent
kelly1mm
Mar 6
#43
Lean same, with reservations because this could have been handled without making it an excuse to bash good people.
Silent Type
Mar 6
#18
In reality, sure, it is inconsequential. That doesn't mean it isn't "an issue."
Tom Rinaldo
Mar 6
#46
You can't effect change unless you win. We also need to win back democrats that voted for Trump due to this issue.
Pisces
Mar 6
#54
The GQP has certainly found a fabulous non-issue issue with which to divide people
groundloop
Mar 6
#33
Some progressive Dems I've spoken to think trans issues were a factor in Harris' loss
SpankMe
Mar 6
#36