Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

brooklynite

(94,500 posts)
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 05:37 PM Nov 2013

One in Five Stars Has Earth-sized Planet in Habitable Zone [View all]

Source: W. M . Keck Observatory

Waimea, Hawaii – Scientists from University of California, Berkeley, and University of Hawaii, Manoa, have statistically determined that twenty percent of Sun-like stars in our galaxy have Earth-sized planets that could host life. The findings, gleaned from data collected from NASA’s Kepler spacecraft and the W. M. Keck Observatory, now satisfy Kepler's primary mission: to determine how many of the 100 billion stars in our galaxy have potentially habitable planets. The results are being published November 4 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"What this means is, when you look up at the thousands of stars in the night sky, the nearest sun-like star with an Earth-size planet in its habitable zone is probably only 12 light years away and can be seen with the naked eye. That is amazing," said UC Berkeley graduate student Erik Petigura, who led the analysis of the Kepler and Keck Observatory data.

"For NASA, this number – that every fifth star has a planet somewhat like Earth – is really important, because successor missions to Kepler will try to take an actual picture of a planet, and the size of the telescope they have to build depends on how close the nearest Earth-size planets are," said Andrew Howard, astronomer with the Institute for Astronomy at the University of Hawaii. "An abundance of planets orbiting nearby stars simplifies such follow-up missions."

The team, which also included planet hunter Geoffrey Marcy, UC Berkeley professor of astronomy, cautioned that Earth-size planets in Earth-size orbits are not necessarily hospitable to life, even if they orbit in the habitable zone of a star where the temperature is not too hot and not too cold.






Read more: http://www.keckobservatory.org/recent/entry/one_in_five_stars_has_earth_sized_planet_in_habitable_zone



But which one is the Planet Kolob?
62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
good, because we've got to get out of this place maxsolomon Nov 2013 #1
Well, if the nearest possible inhabitable planet is only 12 light years away.. olddad56 Nov 2013 #5
I sure as hell don't wish that on the inhabitants of other worlds. Crunchy Frog Nov 2013 #12
Our sun will eventually go supernova maxsolomon Nov 2013 #39
Never gonna happen. Besides, if we wreck this place, we don't deserve a second chance. arcane1 Nov 2013 #28
If ? olddad56 Nov 2013 #34
Indeed! arcane1 Nov 2013 #48
"...we don't deserve a second chance." ??? Peace Patriot Nov 2013 #50
I'm an atheist, I don't need you to tell me the old testament is fiction. arcane1 Nov 2013 #54
You say you're an atheist yet you doom humanity... Peace Patriot Nov 2013 #60
What an absurd statement. I'm not dooming anyone, nor am I capable of doing so. arcane1 Nov 2013 #61
Sorry, each dominant species only gets one planet to destroy. Arugula Latte Nov 2013 #58
wonder how much longer Earth will be habitable. olddad56 Nov 2013 #2
At the rate corporations are despoiling the environment for financial gain, aided and abetted by indepat Nov 2013 #13
About another billion years or so... Humanist_Activist Nov 2013 #19
"Only 12 light years away" jberryhill Nov 2013 #3
So where is everybody? bananas Nov 2013 #4
No, I think many of the tea partiers might be from another planet. olddad56 Nov 2013 #8
Just because they're in the habitable zone doesn't mean they're habitable. OnlinePoker Nov 2013 #11
Yep. "Habitable" has a different meaning for scientists than for "normal people". Xithras Nov 2013 #57
Neil deGrasse Tyson Is Worried That Humans Are Too Stupid For Aliens progressoid Nov 2013 #14
I tend to think that is the problem .. It would be nice if they could help us out.. we need it. YOHABLO Nov 2013 #21
The opposite is also possible Scootaloo Nov 2013 #29
Indeed, our combination of intelligence, curiosity, and tool innovation are probably quite rare. arcane1 Nov 2013 #30
They moved out when we moved in... penultimate Nov 2013 #16
Depends on what you mean by everybody.... paleotn Nov 2013 #23
That's the Fermi Paradox Prophet 451 Nov 2013 #24
My closure of the Fermi Paradox is quite simple. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #32
It's a good solution Prophet 451 Nov 2013 #33
This is a great and fascinating post, but the Mediocrity Principle sounds like bullshit to me. arcane1 Nov 2013 #36
"it was a giant leap from "intelligent" life to industrial civilization" GliderGuider Nov 2013 #37
You made the leap, right there in your reply. arcane1 Nov 2013 #38
Intelligence is necessary but not sufficient. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #40
Where did this free energy come from? arcane1 Nov 2013 #41
Well, it comes from the sun. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #43
I have a feeling we agree more than we disagree. arcane1 Nov 2013 #45
Yes, I suspect so too! GliderGuider Nov 2013 #46
A toast, to whatever processes resulted in our good fortune to be here discussing said processes! arcane1 Nov 2013 #47
It wouldn't take much of a change for hydropower to have been the dominant power source muriel_volestrangler Nov 2013 #51
There is no intelligent life on those planets, just like Earth. hunter Nov 2013 #62
I hope so Politicalboi Nov 2013 #31
Fermi's paradox. n/t Comrade Grumpy Nov 2013 #56
They may already have life but not as we know it dipsydoodle Nov 2013 #6
we still have life, but not as we knew it before 2000. olddad56 Nov 2013 #9
I'd go back as far as 1980 and the "election" of Ronald Reagan. YOHABLO Nov 2013 #22
And no one calls.. denbot Nov 2013 #7
Would you call dipsydoodle Nov 2013 #10
Our system has 3 plants in the; greiner3 Nov 2013 #15
It's kind of a blurry definition. longship Nov 2013 #20
If any within a few dozen light years have modern life on them seveneyes Nov 2013 #17
If their technology level was much higher than ours they may use a different method ... spin Nov 2013 #25
One more data point in the Drake equation. longship Nov 2013 #18
Yes, Indeed ... Stuart G Nov 2013 #26
Do you suppose any have a population hell bent on self destruction. liberal N proud Nov 2013 #27
Hope there is intellegent life on one of them..... Rebellious Republican Nov 2013 #35
interesting gopiscrap Nov 2013 #42
20% percent of SUN-LIKE stars. Ash_F Nov 2013 #44
My favorite TV show said it all Rosco T. Nov 2013 #49
So maybe we CAN Cruise to the Galactic Federation on a DC 8. Kablooie Nov 2013 #52
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #53
god is one busy motherfucker! snooper2 Nov 2013 #55
But ... but ... Earth is the center of the universe and mankind is the sole focus of The Deity! Arugula Latte Nov 2013 #59
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»One in Five Stars Has Ear...