Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
21. Many studies of biotech food suggest problems more widespread than the role of glycophosphate.
Sat Nov 30, 2013, 09:58 AM
Nov 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002803435

POST 4:

...In addition, many studies implicate Bt-toxin as an allergen. In its natural state derived from soil bacteria, Bt-toxin has triggered immune responses in farm workers and allergic- and flu-like symptoms in hundreds of exposed citizens.21 It also evoked immune responses 22 (and intestinal tissue damage) 23 in mice. Similarly, an Italian government study showed that mice fed Bt-corn had dramatic immune responses.24 And thousands of Indian farm workers who harvest Bt cotton are also experiencing allergic- and flu-like symptoms.25

Thus, Bt-toxin production within our intestines might simultaneously trigger immune responses, compromise our digestive tract, and expose the blood to undigested food (which may further trigger immune responses).

And now the bad news: a 2011 Canadian study conducted at Sherbrooke Hospital discovered that 93% of the pregnant women they tested had Bt-toxin from Monsanto’s corn in their blood. And so did 80% of their unborn fetuses.26

The toxin is likely to 'wash out' of our blood fairly quickly. If that is the case, how can we explain why more than 9 out of 10 women had it circulating? It must be that the intake of Bt-toxin must be very frequent. But Canadians don’t eat that many corn chips and tortillas. They do eat lots of corn derivatives like corn syrup, but these highly processed foods no longer have the Bt-toxin present.

The authors of the study speculate that the source of the Bt-toxin in the blood must have been the meat and dairy of animals fed Bt corn. This assumes that the Bt-toxin protein remains intact through the animals’ entire digestive process and then again through the humans’ digestive process after they eat the meat or dairy.

A more plausible explanation may be that Bt-toxin genes transfer from corn chips or tortillas into our gut bacteria. The active genes then produce the (substance) on a continuous basis inside the intestinal tract, which then gets into our blood. And for pregnant mothers, the toxin then travels through the placenta into their fetuses.

<...>

21. Green M et al. Public health implications of the microbial pesticide Bacillus thuringiensis: An epidemiological study, Oregon, 1985-86, Amer J Public Health. 1990;80(7):848–852. Noble MA, Riben PD, and Cook GJ. Microbiological and epidemiological surveillance program to monitor the health effects of Foray 48B BTK spray (Vancouver, BC: Ministry of Forests, Province of British Columbi, Sep. 30, 1992)

22. Vazquez et al. Intragastric and intraperitoneal administration of Cry1Ac protoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis induces systemic and mucosal antibody responses in mice. 1897–1912. Vazquez et al. Characterization of the mucosal and systemic immune response induced by Cry1Ac protein from Bacillus thuringiensis HD 73 in mice. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2000;33:147–155. Vazquez et al. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac protoxin is a potent systemic and mucosal adjuvant. Scandanavian Journal of Immunology. 1999;49:578–584. See also Vazquez-Padron et al. 147 (2000b).

23. Fares NH, El-Sayed AK. Fine Structural Changes in the Ileum of Mice Fed on Endotoxin Treated Potatoes and Transgenic Potatoes. Natural Toxins. 1998;6:219–233.

24. Finamore A et al. Intestinal and Peripheral Immune Response to MON810 Maize Ingestion in Weaning and Old Mice. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56:11533-11539.

25. Gupta A et al. Impact of Bt Cotton on Farmers’ Health (in Barwani and Dhar District of Madhya Pradesh). Investigation Report, Oct–Dec 2005. Also, "Bt cotton causing allergic reaction in MP; cattle dead," Bhopal, Nov. 23, 2005.

26. Aris A, Leblanc S. Maternal and fetal exposure to pesticides associated to genetically modified foods in Eastern Townships of Quebec, Canada. Reprod Toxicol. 2011 May;31(4):528-33. Epub 2011 Feb 18.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/12312207

SUMMARY: GMO corn/soy/canola/cottonseed crops -> manufactured into food additives -> inadequately tested as recently detailed in multiple peer-reviewed journal articles by multi-year PEW FOOD ADDITIVES PROJECT -> backed by last month's PRESS RELEASE from AMERICAN professional medical groups comprised of 57,000 ob-gyns + 7.000 reproductive medicine specialists.

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=B846909A-A5E3-4A27-A8DA-631FD66F9DED

http://www.pewhealth.org/other-resource/pew-examines-gaps-in-toxicity-data-for-chemicals-allowed-in-food-85899493633
http://www.pewhealth.org/projects/food-additives-project-85899367220
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890623813003298

LOOK FOR THE WORD "FOOD" (although the category encompasses more than gmos, obviously):
http://www.asrm.org/Environmental_Chemicals_Harm_Reproductive_Health/
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/09/23/environmental-chemicals-pregnancy-risk/2857753/
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2013/09/24/environmental-chemicals-pregnancy-risk-report-claims/
I remember asking my microbiology instructor if GMO crops are dangerous to humans darkangel218 Nov 2013 #1
Or a far simpler explanation. Archae Nov 2013 #2
DO YOU LIKE ROUNDUP READY GMO'S SoLeftIAmRight Nov 2013 #10
I think everything should be labeled with how its made and where its from and whats in it. 7962 Nov 2013 #24
I assume that I already eat it Peregrine Dec 2013 #51
FYI. proverbialwisdom Nov 2013 #4
Yes, the very notion that there could be a "scientific consensus" that GMOs bemildred Nov 2013 #15
Many studies of biotech food suggest problems more widespread than the role of glycophosphate. proverbialwisdom Nov 2013 #21
We are meddling with stuff we still understand quite poorly in biology. bemildred Nov 2013 #23
If That's what she really said, she shouldn't be teaching microbiology PaulaFarrell Nov 2013 #13
She was reffering to geneticaly modified crops darkangel218 Nov 2013 #14
Right, and that is not the question that needs to be addressed, bemildred Nov 2013 #17
If the combination of mutation plant DNA with our DNA is not the cause of concern, than what it is? darkangel218 Nov 2013 #31
It's not just about cancer either. bemildred Nov 2013 #32
I see. Thanks for the info. darkangel218 Nov 2013 #34
My pleasure. bemildred Nov 2013 #35
I agree 100%. darkangel218 Nov 2013 #39
Indeed. nt bemildred Nov 2013 #16
Anti-GMO folk have a few different rationales. Igel Nov 2013 #30
I just love it when.... BronxBoy Dec 2013 #61
All creatures of biology use the easiest and quickest routes to acquire building blocks for growth nolabels Dec 2013 #56
GM WATCH Press Release: Journal retraction of Séralini study is illicit, unscientific, and unethical proverbialwisdom Nov 2013 #3
Those rats... CSStrowbridge Nov 2013 #5
Don't miss this documenting the tremendous support garnered by the study among many scientists. proverbialwisdom Nov 2013 #7
Well, flawed methodology is generally not "woo." Deep13 Nov 2013 #6
Could it be bad for us? Sure but we eat alot of foods that are toxic. cstanleytech Nov 2013 #8
Watch out for the strawman SoLeftIAmRight Nov 2013 #9
Study: Monsanto's Roundup Herbicide Linked to Cancer, Autism, Parkinson's CountAllVotes Nov 2013 #11
YES! the stories of miracle GMO's just hide the damage done by roundup SoLeftIAmRight Nov 2013 #12
"In combination with" BadgerKid Nov 2013 #19
It says there are synergistic effects, things don't in general have single causes. bemildred Nov 2013 #20
^^This!^^ BrotherIvan Nov 2013 #37
Hopefully they can explore no till farming. Many farrmers are seeing KurtNYC Nov 2013 #22
There is a significant effort being undertaken. BronxBoy Dec 2013 #63
Finally. Can't believe it was published to start with. Junk 'science' at it worst idwiyo Nov 2013 #18
Monsanto got to them arikara Nov 2013 #25
Right. Sure. "It's a conspiracy! They got to them!" Yibble yibble yibble... Archae Nov 2013 #26
Recommend for the Replies on thread with other studies and discussion. KoKo Nov 2013 #27
Shrug. I just skip corn, and any foods that have corn products in them. djean111 Nov 2013 #28
Shrugging ain't enough, as GMOs are in at least 8 classes of food and now the "creators" of GMO fish drynberg Nov 2013 #29
I am shrugging at the attempt to make light of doubts and fears about GMOs. djean111 Nov 2013 #42
the faithful woo believers will continue to cite it forever, though.... mike_c Nov 2013 #33
MUST READ. Bottom, retraction letter; top, gmwatch press release (irrefutably measured/reasonable). proverbialwisdom Nov 2013 #36
LOL.... mike_c Nov 2013 #38
To be honest I am more interested in what the science says but hey if it floats your boat cstanleytech Nov 2013 #40
Projecting much? Or maybe you forgot the sarcasm smilie. proverbialwisdom Nov 2013 #41
There is a glaring conflict of interest ronnie624 Dec 2013 #49
Oh its always good to question something like that dont get me wrong cstanleytech Dec 2013 #54
CT group is that way -----> idwiyo Dec 2013 #46
Transparency is bad? If that's what you really think, it's s a glaring blindspot in judgement. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #47
As I said, CT group is that way -----> idwiyo Dec 2013 #48
Your skill at employing the "CT" meme needs lots of honing. n/t ronnie624 Dec 2013 #50
Once again what?! JackRiddler Nov 2013 #43
GM = big fat corporations Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2013 #44
Those with the deepest pockets censor science SpcMnky Nov 2013 #45
The experiment failed to take into account the feng shui of the laboratory. Ian David Dec 2013 #52
Sorry for my ignnorance Phlem Dec 2013 #53
Generic term, used most often for describing quackery. Archae Dec 2013 #55
They're full of SHIT DeSwiss Dec 2013 #57
You really don't get it, do you? OrwellwasRight Dec 2013 #58
Bwaaa ha ha ha - this is So Bogus Berlum Dec 2013 #59
Funny how that shouldn't be considered..: BronxBoy Dec 2013 #62
IOW, you go with BS faith, and ignore evidence. HuckleB Feb 2014 #64
An interesting take on this...... BronxBoy Dec 2013 #60
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Journal retracts genetica...»Reply #21