Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Casual marijuana use linked to brain changes [View all]seabeckind
(1,957 posts)I guess it's making the rounds...trying give some credibility to the anti-legalization position. I'm not sure that all the anti's are opposed for financial reasons. I think that there are many who fell for that reefer madness bullsh!t and have their position for ideological reasons.
And they're usually wingnuts. Some PRIC is using this as a wedge issue once again. Get the fox viewers all worked up so they'll vote. SOP
Then there's the study itself. Anybody who takes a look at it recognises right off that it's bogus. No where near scientific, doesn't appear to be peer reviewed, etc. But the target will never question it.
But it does satisfy one very important factor. It's a link. You know how all the time some smartass librul is saying "You got a link for that?", well, here it is. That means that any argument you might be doing shifts from the argument about the issue to an argumnet about the veracity of the study...oops, what were we talking about? SOP
Parallel? NIPCC. Trying to pretend to be real scientists.
Evil f'ers.