Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: CNN refuses to cover benghazi [View all]JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)34. "Megaphone" is a bit overstated.
Mini-micro, maybe.
Right this microsecond it's possible more people are reading this thread than watching the alleged news network known as CNN.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm looking forward to a new entry in Webster's dictionary in a few years:
RoverSuswade
May 2014
#38
Right. Sadly, there are DUers who appear on Fox. Fox uses them to make itself look legitimate.
JDPriestly
May 2014
#5
I take back every nasty thing I've ever said about Zucker that I meant at the time and still do.
TeamPooka
May 2014
#7
What telling is that they apparently thought the Malaysian flight was "a legitimate news story." nt
Gore1FL
May 2014
#19
I love how Faux complains that the "mainstream media" won't cover Benghazi
Dopers_Greed
May 2014
#25
That would be good if they were still not obsessed with covering the airplane.
liberal N proud
May 2014
#29
Yes, that all sounds good, but this is about things that politicians do. It should be covered,
hughee99
May 2014
#31
If they get Brad Pitt up there, I don't think they're going to get the publicity they want.
JoeyT
May 2014
#48
As a kid, I recall hearing the phrase "Politics as usual." Some things just never change.
tofuandbeer
May 2014
#51