Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
57. Well, here's a start:
Sat May 31, 2014, 01:21 AM
May 2014

This is from the Drug War Chronicle in February. Since then, I think all the 2014 initiative efforts have given up the ghost. But these guys are ready to play in 2016.

http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2014/feb/18/big_players_will_wait_until_2016

Big Players Will Wait Until 2016 on California Marijuana Legalization Initiative
by Phillip Smith, February 18, 2014, 04:05pm, (Issue #822)

The Los Angeles Times reported today that a deep-pocketed marijuana reform coalition including the Drug Policy Alliance had decided not to move forward this year with an initiative to legalize the weed in the Golden State. Instead, the coalition will aim at 2016.

That means marijuana legalization will most likely not be on the ballot in California this year. Three other legalization initiatives have been filed, but two of them appear to lack the funds to complete expensive signature gathering efforts -- 504,000 signatures are needed by April 18 -- and the third has yet to be cleared for circulation.

The coalition, which is supported by billionaire financier George Soros, and which included the late Progressive Insurance founder Peter Lewis, had consistently argued that 2016 was more doable than this year, but filed the Control, Regulate and Tax Marijuana Act late last year after polling numbers suggested victory was within reach.

At the time, spokesmen said they would make a decision on whether to move forward or not around the beginning of February. Now, that decision has been made.

The decision to wait was a "very close" call and "one that came down to the wire," Graham Boyd, counsel to Lewis, told The Times. "We see this as a trial run or dress rehearsal for 2016," he said.

Boyd and DPA executive director Ethan Nadelmann told The Times in interviews Monday that they wanted more time to do outreach with elected officials, law enforcement, and public health leaders, an approach they said worked in Washington state. They also said money was an issue, and that the death of Peter Lewis had an impact.

"We believe the best way to go forward with any state ballot initiative is to have a strong funding base in place before launching the campaign," Boyd said. "It is certainly true that Peter Lewis' death made that a much more difficult process to do in the time we had."

The initiatives that in the signature-gathering phase are the Marijuana Control, Legalization and Revenue Act of 2014, sponsored by Americans for Policy Reform, and the Hererite California Cannabis Hemp Initiative 2014. A legalization initiative sponsored by "Guru of Ganja" Ed Rosenthal, the Cannabis Policy Reform Act of 2014, is still awaiting approval at the attorney general's office.

With the prospects slim for any of those initiatives making the ballot this year, at this point, Alaska is the only state that will definitely vote on a marijuana legalization initiative this year. Oregon is another likely contender, but it remains to be seen whether either of the two initiatives filed there will make the ballot.
CA

Proud of California for this. Good work Rohrabacher and Farr! tofuandbeer May 2014 #1
Symbolic only as long as Marijuana remains illegal under federal law. n/t Mr.Bill May 2014 #2
LOL RainDog May 2014 #3
I agree, it's a long, slow battle. Mr.Bill May 2014 #4
This was a bipartisan effort -- one of the cosponsors was GOP. They like that weed, too. nt MADem May 2014 #5
They know it's a winning issue. Enthusiast May 2014 #33
Rand Paul supports the War on Drugs RainDog May 2014 #35
I'm no Paul fan. Either one. Enthusiast May 2014 #38
Rand supports the bill to crack down on legal states RainDog May 2014 #39
Okay. Enthusiast May 2014 #64
The majority of Republicans voted against it RainDog May 2014 #65
Rand makes statements that sound like he's for legalization when the audience supports it. It's okaawhatever May 2014 #46
Okay. Thanks for the clarification. Enthusiast May 2014 #63
The tax revenues alone are a Big Deal. nt MADem May 2014 #45
Medical marijuana isn't always taxed RainDog May 2014 #48
Where medical mj exists, recreational will follow. MADem May 2014 #49
Well... California has had medical mj since the late 1990s RainDog May 2014 #50
Next time we will pass it. Third time is the charm. nt bemildred May 2014 #51
Hope so RainDog May 2014 #53
Wait till CA sees how much money CO makes. MADem May 2014 #52
The first state in in the midwest RainDog May 2014 #55
It's coming in 2016. The big boys with the money will do an initiative then. Comrade Grumpy May 2014 #54
do you have any links RainDog May 2014 #56
Well, here's a start: Comrade Grumpy May 2014 #57
Thanks so much! RainDog May 2014 #62
WOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!1!!!1!!!!This is HUGH!1!1111! Tsiyu May 2014 #6
Yeah, always happy to hear good news! RainDog May 2014 #15
Thanks for your good work, RainDog. Uncle Joe May 2014 #7
Thanks to you and others for kicking the "call" thread RainDog May 2014 #14
Yes, thanks to everyone Uncle Joe May 2014 #17
Thanks for the kind words RainDog May 2014 #19
btw RainDog May 2014 #43
That's an excellent and I believe even enlightening suggestion. Uncle Joe May 2014 #44
Prohibition is a failed public policy. nt TeamPooka May 2014 #8
Kick for sanity! Cha May 2014 #9
Michele Leonhart! DeSwiss May 2014 #10
Legal weed? AAAhhhh!! it's the end of the world!! nikto May 2014 #11
It's a start! progressoid May 2014 #12
Will Senate pass it? TRoN33 May 2014 #13
It's an amendment to a larger bill RainDog May 2014 #16
A (rare) vote for sanity Throd May 2014 #18
Here's a list to find your Senator RainDog May 2014 #20
WOW! Marrah_G May 2014 #21
Please please please let me see the roll call Reter May 2014 #22
Here it is, Reter. Uncle Joe May 2014 #23
LOL RainDog May 2014 #25
Thank you! Reter May 2014 #27
Another welcome to DU to you, Reter RainDog May 2014 #28
Only a handful of Dems voted against it, including Debbie Wasserman Schulz. WTF? Comrade Grumpy May 2014 #31
Debbie is an insider all the way. Enthusiast May 2014 #34
Pelosi voted FOR RainDog May 2014 #37
I wonder if Wasserman Schultz and Wilson are in heavily gerrymandered districts and the idea of Uncle Joe May 2014 #40
I also wonder about Cooper's vote RainDog May 2014 #41
Yes, that was a major disappointment as well. Uncle Joe May 2014 #42
Cooper isn't one of them..... DeSwiss May 2014 #59
Was Debbie voting against the larger bill? Sometimes that happens with amendments. nt okaawhatever May 2014 #47
Only 17 Democrats voted against it RainDog May 2014 #60
Grimm was grim RainDog May 2014 #24
P.S. Welcome to D.U. Reter. Uncle Joe May 2014 #26
Link to list of Democrats who voted against this amendment RainDog May 2014 #29
Let's hope this leads to a sharp decrease in the number of no-knock, kick-down-the-door Aristus May 2014 #30
That would be a good thing RainDog May 2014 #32
I K&R the post in GD but will do so here too. Sissyk May 2014 #36
The House actually did something? Ash_F May 2014 #58
LOL! n/t RainDog May 2014 #61
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Votes To End DEA Ra...»Reply #57