Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
8. No, they aren't.... Davis-Besse: gambling safety for profits
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 05:47 PM
Mar 2012

The NRC is a slave to the nuclear industry; it is a classic case of regulatory capture.

Definition of 'Regulatory Capture '
Regulatory capture is a theory associated with George Stigler, a Nobel laureate economist. It is the process by which regulatory agencies eventually come to be dominated by the very industries they were charged with regulating. Regulatory capture happens when a regulatory agency, formed to act in the public's interest, eventually acts in ways that benefit the industry it is supposed to be regulating, rather than the public.

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/regulatory-capture.asp#axzz1qRzPl4qG


Davis-Besse: gambling safety for profits
NIRS has obtained nearly 2,000 pages of documents on the Davis-Besse affair under the Freedom of Information Act. The documents show that despite receiving false statements from First Energy, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission was aware that Davis-Besse was operating in violation of its license, yet still allowed the reactor to keep running.

Revelations into the near-miss accident at Davis-Besse go far beyond the reactor site perched on the shores of the Great Lakes near Toledo, Ohio. They warn of a dangerous gambit being played by atomic corporations in an increasingly competitive electricity market where public safety is sacrificed to ambitious production schedules. These revelations show that the NRC is willing to turn a blind eye on safety regulations to accommodate these same

In early March 2002, First Energy (FE), true to its name, revealed a policy to drive electricity production ahead of federal safety requirements. This official policy of mismanagement pushed its Davis-Besse nuclear plant to the brink of disaster. Moreover, senior engineers at the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) realized a "high likelihood" that the reactor was so damaged that the risk of a nuclear accident grew greater with continued operation. Yet, federal officials were unable to issue an order to immediately shut the reactor for the necessary inspection and repair. Instead, the agency chose to ignore safety regulations and gamble with disaster to accommodate the financial interest of yet another corporate delinquent.

An NRC bulletin issued in August 2001 called for utilities operating pressurized water reactors (PWR) to inspect for dangerous cracks found in nozzles that penetrate the top of the reactor and house control rod drive mechanisms (CRDM). The NRC bulletin followed the discovery of cracks in Duke Power's Oconee reactor (see 553.5309, "US: NRC ignores widespread safety flaw for decade&quot . Operators were instructed to look for "popcorn-like" traces of boron crystals as reactor coolant escaping from nozzle cracks. The bulletin warned that unchecked cracking in nozzles could grow to component failure, a loss-of- coolant-accident and reactor core damage. NRC required all operators to report inspection results to the agency by 31 December 2001.

However, Davis-Besse operators were eager to complete its two-year operating cycle scheduled for a refueling ...


http://www.klimaatkeuze.nl/wise/monitor/575/5448





More photos here:
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/kristopher/825
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»San Onofre nuclear power ...»Reply #8