Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Colo Ed Bd Member: Give U.S. Credit For Voluntarily Ending Slavery [View all]valerief
(53,235 posts)27. Per Howard Zinn...
Behind the secession of the South from the Union, after Lincoln was elected President in the fall of 1860 as candidate of the new Republican party, was a long series of policy clashes between South and North. The clash was not over slavery as a moral institution-most northerners did not care enough about slavery to make sacrifices for it, certainly not the sacrifice of war. It was not a clash of peoples (most northern whites were not economically favored, not politically powerful; most southern whites were poor farmers, not decisionmakers) but of elites. The northern elite wanted economic expansion-free land, free labor, a free market, a high protective tariff for manufacturers, a bank of the United States. The slave interests opposed all that; they saw Lincoln and the Republicans as making continuation of their pleasant and prosperous way of life impossible in the future.
http://libcom.org/history/lincoln-emancipation-howard-zinn
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Forget it - it did not happen. Our ancestors did not go to fight in it and Abraham Lincoln was never
jwirr
Oct 2014
#15
The Confederate States were volunteering to resolve the issue, once and for all.
eppur_se_muova
Oct 2014
#39
'The war of Northern aggression' just made them go underground. It wasnn't voluntarily.
freshwest
Oct 2014
#20
Truly it was Treason of the worst kind, against the best ideals that the Constitution promised.
freshwest
Oct 2014
#47
Do You suppose that this wonderful bit of information...about "voluntary end of slavery"
Stuart G
Oct 2014
#10
Oh she will not go that far. She will just want the extermination of 10 million people wiped off the
jwirr
Oct 2014
#16
What absolute bullshit . It's just more rewriting history to fit their ideology and attacking the
geretogo
Oct 2014
#12
I don't think it is not knowing. It is the same idea we have seen with the textbook controversy down
jwirr
Oct 2014
#18
"Materials should not encourage or condone civil disorder, social strife or disregard of the law ...
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2014
#17
That sounds as if it could have been lifted from the pages of a Maoist China instruction manual
IDemo
Oct 2014
#40
You are correct - it was the 13th Amendment that ended slavery. The Civil War stopped the
24601
Oct 2014
#33
Voluntarily. Why do we elect these twits and history deniers? She has to be stupid on purpose.
marble falls
Oct 2014
#23
Sherman's March alone proves this politician is a jackass. A well-deserved march I might add.
wolfie001
Oct 2014
#32
If you watched "Gettysburg" you would know the South wasn't fighting to preserve slavery,
tclambert
Oct 2014
#36
The Southern slave owners said, "Your right! Slavery is wrong! We'll free them! No need for a war!"
DesertDiamond
Oct 2014
#43