Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Yes, it is a good read. Esp after all the lies being posed in gd-p. riversedge Feb 2016 #1
DU posters Floridanow Feb 2016 #4
More likely to come Floridanow Feb 2016 #2
Clinton trying to cling to the other two Secretarys of State is a deception. Jarqui Feb 2016 #3
None of the email was classified. Floridanow Feb 2016 #5
You need to reread my post. It provides a transcript of Jarqui Feb 2016 #6
I think Secretary Clinton knows it was TS at the time Press Virginia Feb 2016 #8
I do not understand her strategy. Did she really think that not coming clean Jarqui Feb 2016 #9
I don't think she's capable of admitting mistakes Press Virginia Feb 2016 #11
I think so as well. This is not a little "oops". It's not a one time thing. Jarqui Feb 2016 #12
From the IG of the Intelligence Community Jarqui Feb 2016 #7
you apparently have your own personal def' of 'deception' contradictory to what every one else means Bill USA Feb 2016 #13
You want to provide a link to that quote. (I doubt it matters... but) Jarqui Feb 2016 #15
it well known that Bernie said:""Nobody wants to hear about your damn emails." Bill USA Feb 2016 #19
Nope Jarqui Feb 2016 #20
LOL! the 1st step in disinformation is to willfully misinterpret the opponents statements. Bill USA Feb 2016 #21
that was not a quote from Bernie - I would have put the statment in quotes - it was my own Bill USA Feb 2016 #22
you should understand that Democrats are not impressed with Punk Talk. Which you have some facility Bill USA Feb 2016 #23
RE your statement: "Powell and Rice did not: - have their own unsecured server".. they had personal Bill USA Feb 2016 #14
Have you got a link to that eyesore? to back it up nt Jarqui Feb 2016 #16
are U being offensive "eyesore"? here are more links in addition to the one in OP, did you read it? Bill USA Feb 2016 #17
No, I'm aware of the media stories on Powell & Rice Jarqui Feb 2016 #18
the para you ask links for cites facts that have been reported numerous times. IF you hadn't been Bill USA Feb 2016 #24
A long winded way of saying "I'm pullin' this out of my a**" and Jarqui Feb 2016 #25
re: comment 14. if you can't be more specific I am not going to begin a private seminar for you.. Bill USA Feb 2016 #27
That might explain ejbr Feb 2016 #10
So she's justifying herself in terms of the Dubya administration? Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #26
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»State Department: Powell,...»Reply #10