Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
7. TTIP basically reduces the environmental regulations to the lowest common denominator
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 01:18 AM
Mar 2016

all the rest is irrelevant, as trade deals PREEMPT NATIONAL LAWS AND WISHES

Also the energy deal will heavily impact affordable housing potentially resulting in the loss of millions of postwar formerly public housing, ecase of gATS it can never be replaced, there cannot be any more public housing because of standstill, starting in 1995, have you seen any new public housing since 1995, no, why? because its GATS-illegal thats why.

So millions of people may have nowhere to go. They will be saved from high energy prices by being rendered homeless. there wont even be any green jobs building the replacement housing. That will likely go to third world firms as they are truly poor and its allowed to discriminate in their favor.

Energy must be deregulated, WTO says so. So the US will have to upgrade its housing stock, sorry.

See https://doughenwood.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/92392289-fitch-on-obama.pdf

Energy trade is part of the ongoing discussions within the TTIP talks.
Nondiscrimination for bilateral trade in raw materials and energy are among
the stated objectives of the European Union for the TTIP, see European
Commission (2013). A more detailed version of the EU position was leaked
in June 2014; for a brief analysis see “EU Pursues Strong Energy Chapter In
TTIP, Along The Lines Of Leaked Paper,”
Inside U.S. Trade
, June 5, 2014,
www.insidetrade.com (accessed on June 10, 2014).
See leaked document from the European Commission dated
May 27, 2014. See Lydia DePillis, “E.U. presses U.S. on oil-export ban,”
Washington Post
, July 9, 2014, A11.
3. See Josh Zumbrun, “Upshot of Domestic Oil Boom: Fewer Shocks,”
Wall
Street Journal
, June 18, 2014, A2

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Clinton-style centrist ec...»Reply #7