Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Atman

(31,464 posts)

4. I updated my post while you were responding.

Reply to enough (Reply #3)

Sat Dec 17, 2011, 10:08 AM

Dec 2011

I don't think the argument is made "convincingly." It is made well, but it is still based upon a person's interpretation of the vagueries in the language. Others interpret the language differently.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Three myths about the detention bill [View all] 4dsc Dec 2011 OP

The argument is in regard to detention of US citizens Atman Dec 2011 #1

That is Myth #3 in Greenfield's article linked in the OP. I think he deals with convincingly. (nt) enough Dec 2011 #3

I updated my post while you were responding. Atman Dec 2011 #4

Not to mention that this law raping the U.S. Constitution is even more dangerous... Ferret Annica Dec 2011 #2

It is dangerous logic to call the codifying of the 'war' on 'terror' a myth, no matter how well ixion Dec 2011 #5

but there is an exception for U.S. citizens.... dennis4868 Dec 2011 #6