Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)

4. Yeah, but appointing the acting director when the director resigns, doesn't sound

Reply to pbmus (Reply #3)

Tue Nov 28, 2017, 10:39 PM

Nov 2017

non-partisan to me. Should have done it sooner so as not to appearing gaming things. That junk needs to stop, as Dotard says "on both sides."

I do get trying to keep a Trump appointee out.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump wins the first round in court. The public is likely to be the loser: Our view [View all] pbmus Nov 2017 OP

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly atreides1 Nov 2017 #1

I despise Trump and his henchmen, but why would a former director have the power Hoyt Nov 2017 #2

Barney says succession was set up to avoid partisan politics... pbmus Nov 2017 #3

Yeah, but appointing the acting director when the director resigns, doesn't sound Hoyt Nov 2017 #4

The way I understand LAW, it says acting deputy director succeeds pbmus Nov 2017 #5

In essence there was. Cordray appointed his Chief of Staff to Deputy Director Hoyt Nov 2017 #6

And Democrats have to do the right thing first... pbmus Nov 2017 #7

Well, someone needs to do the right thing. Doubt we'll win this one in court, and not sure we should Hoyt Nov 2017 #8