Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Time for change

(13,714 posts)

1. I just read a DU post asking why Trump tries so hard to obstruct the Russia investigation if he's

Reply to Tace (Original post)

Sun Jul 8, 2018, 02:04 PM

Jul 2018

innocent.

I would ask the same thing about the voting machine corporations.

If they don't engage in election fraud, why do they always prohibit investigations of their machines in controversial elections? Worse yet, why does our government let them get away with that? By what logic should the voting machines that count our votes be considered private property, off limits to inspection by the public?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US Election Fraud 2004 to Present -- Part I: Vulnerability of Electronic Vote Counting Dale Tavris [View all] Tace Jul 2018 OP

I just read a DU post asking why Trump tries so hard to obstruct the Russia investigation if he's Time for change Jul 2018 #1

After they passed HAVA we have seen a "red state shift" in the voting returns despite ... Botany Jul 2018 #2

Absolutely Time for change Jul 2018 #3

There are procedures in place to test Gothmog Jul 2018 #4

Here are the procedures used in Texas Gothmog Jul 2018 #5

Gothmog, Thanks for the first-hand info. Tace Jul 2018 #6

I would encourage any DUer who can to serve as an election worker Gothmog Jul 2018 #7

Are you saying the machines cannot be hacked? RussBLib Jul 2018 #8

These machines can not be hacked at the election site Gothmog Jul 2018 #9