Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KPN

(15,635 posts)
6. Not an attorney so I don't have any citation handy.
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 09:48 PM
Nov 2020

I just know that there are probably thousands of regulations that stipulate a standard that must be met without regard for differing circumstances. Some States’ building codes are an example, e.g., insulation values that must be met. Regulations/orders are always simplified to some degree and at some level just for the sake of administrative efficiency. The same is true for the private sector with sops and policy. This ruling is a prejudiced ruling based on an agenda. I just wonder whether one of its consequences might’ve unleashing challenges to many regulations based on the notion that one size does not fit all circumstances. That seems to be one of the backbones in their argument.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Midnight Ruling Exposes R...»Reply #6