Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
89. specifically: Concentration of wealth and deregulation - a prescription for disaster
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 08:06 PM
Jun 2012

Inflated the housing bubble three ways:

1. Propping up a sick economy with easy money. Easy money policy at FED kept interest rates low. This was needed to prop up an economy that would have gone into recession without it. Tax cuts weighted mostly for the highest income tax brackets meant that the tax burden was being shifted to middle income people. They were finding themselves without as much money (median incomes were going down in the Bush years - for the first time in 50 years) and the only way they could keep them 'buggers' buying to support the economy was with easy credit and cheap money. So personal debt kept increasing as people tried to maintain lifestyles they were used to with declining incomes. Meanwhile GDP was growing at it's slowest rate 70 years( see: "The Aughts: the Lost Decade for Economy, Workers").

2. Not only ignored but fought efforts to rein in Predatory Lenders by 50 states attorneys General (see: Predatory Lenders Partner in Crime)

3. Deregulation. Phil Gramm, deregulator extraordinaire, slipped the Commodities Futures Modernization act 2000 in as a rider to the Omnibus Funding bill in the last few days of the Clinton administration (and just before the Congressional Christmas recess). The Omnibus Funding bill (an 11,000 page document) was a MUST PASS (ie. veto proof) bill before the legislature could leave as it was necessary to keep the Government operating. When Gramm slipped in the CFMA in as a rider - nobody in Congress even knew it was in there.

The CFMA had been held up in committee for about a year or more basically because Democrats were very suspicious of it. Gramm knew to get it passed he had to perform some pretty clever slight of hand legislative trickery. The CFMA made trading in Credit Default Swaps Legal and UNREGULATED. Credit Default Swaps were sold to investors in higher rate (i.e. riskier) Collaterized Debt Obligations (bundled mortgages). The banks explained to the investors (e.g. pension funds, sovereign wealth funds) that if the CDO tranche they invested in went into default the CDS would pay off so the investor would not lose any of his money. this was like Christmas in July...the investor got higher returns with NO RISK OF LOSS... or so it was sold.

Selling the CDSs which were sold as risk eliminators made high yield CDOs very much in demand by investors and their Wall Street Banksters. The banksters told mortgage originators they could buy all the high yield (sub-prime) mortgages lenders could supply. NOTE regular prime rate mortgages were NOT what the Wall Street Banksters wanted. They wanted high yield mortgages. Thus predatory lenders could 'flip' all the sub-prime mortgages they could write. So Predatory lenders were lassoing suckers and writing liar loans and all the alt-A (negative amortization loans - i.e. interest only payment loans, and baloon payment loans) they could get away with (cf. Predatory Lenders Partner in Crime - above).

The CFMA also included the notorious ENRON loophole allowing UNREGULATED trading of energy futures over electronic media. This of course lead to the ripping off of California residence to the tune of Billions of dollars the eventual collapse of ENRON. Thousands out of jobs and without any pensions!

The loose money policies were necessary to prop up an economy which was dieing slowly. It was flagging because tax cuts went mostly to the highest income people thus increasing the tax burden on middle income people who were slowly buying less. so easy money/credit was necessary to enable the people to keep buying - to hold off the recession. Because there was not really enought demand to keep businesses making money and growing, those who did have money were finding it hard to find good investment opportunities (the stock market at this time was not all that great except for home builders). So they were casting about for ways to make money on their investments. The only sector that looked good was housing (as long as the cheap money and loose credit continued).

Eventually the shit hit the fan when the housing bubble could not continue. Banks were holding massive amounts of bad debts (worthless mortgages) that alas, the credit Default swaps could not cover as AIG was going bankrupt trying to pay-off all the Wall Street Banksters CDSs! Hank Paulson went to Bush and Congress and said a bailout was necessary to preclude a collapse of the entire banking sector. Trillions of dollars in bad loans were held by banks which wanted the Taxpayer buy for ridiculous prices. TARP didn't allow for all THAT much of a bailout so trillions of dollars in bad loans still remained on banks books slowing the recovery which was to follow (albeit fought by GOP every inch of the way).

It was a spectacular disaster - a Trickle Down - Deregulation Disaster. Which dragged us into this REPUBLICAN DYSTOPIA.

for more details see: How did this Happen


BUT I DO NOT THINK THEIR INTENT WAS TO CRASH THE ECONOMY - I DON'T THINK THEY KNEW ANY BETTER.

They don't think far enough to see that concentration of wealth eventually leads to a slow growth economy with poor job creation because there isn't enough demand for the products businesses want to sell. They are paid to push deregulation and I think they really don't "get it" that regulation if necessary not only to protect us from greedy people who manage businesses (businessmen are, after all, just people. they are not perfect. They can be just as selfish and short sighted as anyone). A proportion of people (some of them managing businesses) are willing to cheat to make more money. Without regulations disaster is inevitable. But Republicans are paid to fight regulation and some of them may actually believe the deregulatory nonsense they are paid to repeat.

... but they have been fighting every effort of the Dems to rebuild the economy since then.





Yes! n/t RKP5637 Jun 2012 #1
Can We All Agree liberalmike27 Jun 2012 #19
I agree that we could have a full-employment economy, but I didn't see any filibusters on C-SPAN. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #44
It has been my main gripe Sekhmets Daughter Jun 2012 #47
Don't forget. Obama has only vetoed two bills in these past 3 1/2 years. JDPriestly Jun 2012 #74
It's like... Donkeykick Jun 2012 #87
Precisely Sherman A1 Jun 2012 #25
I'd say they've been pretty obvious about it actually jimlup Jun 2012 #2
I so admire your optimism jimlup BrendaBrick Jun 2012 #71
Yep ... jimlup Jun 2012 #88
Excellent point! BrendaBrick Jun 2012 #90
i think all along some have been plotting a class warfare plan to establish brewens Jun 2012 #3
Their money is in the Caymans and invested in the sweat shops of the world. JDPriestly Jun 2012 #75
Gotta agree about the inheritance of houses. That is a MAJOR boost to the kids, if the parents Nay Jun 2012 #84
Answer: YES lastlib Jun 2012 #4
I started telling people back in 2003 that there would be a deep recession rurallib Jun 2012 #5
rurallib Diclotican Jun 2012 #34
Yes wendylaroux Jun 2012 #6
These people going along with taking down the middle class, don't know brewens Jun 2012 #8
Sure they will, in fact Sekhmets Daughter Jun 2012 #51
The simple short answer is WHEN CRABS ROAR Jun 2012 #67
The 1% is destroying capitalism by destroying the consumer factor in capitalism. JDPriestly Jun 2012 #76
Is the Pope Catholic? Does a bear shit in the woods? Harry Monroe Jun 2012 #7
No. They just followed orders from their owners. Ready4Change Jun 2012 #9
DUH flamingdem Jun 2012 #10
What do we call people who sell out our nation for an ideology or a political party? Cary Jun 2012 #11
Why can't a newspaper in THIS country carry that headline? SunSeeker Jun 2012 #12
Michael Cohen is a US columnist dipsydoodle Jun 2012 #14
It was a rhetorical question. SunSeeker Jun 2012 #30
Because Republican money owns all the media.. Print, radio ,TV lib2DaBone Jun 2012 #59
Yes, and the treasonous bastards bragg about it! santamargarita Jun 2012 #13
The Dems need to quit mumbling it to themselves, and start shouting it to the rafters!! loudsue Jun 2012 #15
Respectfully, I think that it started with Nixon and his open-trade policy with China. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #41
By that theory I guess Germany is deliberately crashing Europe? dkf Jun 2012 #16
You are truly amazing. kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #24
Democrats are just as hard headed as Republicans. dkf Jun 2012 #27
Teachers create jobs. That's how the "DU guys" were able to do it. SunSeeker Jun 2012 #31
Teachers do create jobs but what is debatable is how many you need. dkf Jun 2012 #35
All the while gov employee's wages were increasing they were still trailing rhett o rick Jun 2012 #36
Uh it's the curriculum/textbook writers! They're meant to not teach, like the Everyday Math program, Dont call me Shirley Jun 2012 #50
Shortening the work week of the parents might help raise kids test scores JDPriestly Jun 2012 #80
Three word reply: "Look at Finland". mwooldri Jun 2012 #82
Don't know your history? Sekhmets Daughter Jun 2012 #53
In a sense, yes. Germany lent a lot of money or signed for loans lent to less wealthy JDPriestly Jun 2012 #78
YES nt abelenkpe Jun 2012 #17
Its the party of AsahinaKimi Jun 2012 #18
LMFAO Dont call me Shirley Jun 2012 #49
Most definitely. The other important question is, Are Democrats enabling them by not Cal33 Jun 2012 #20
Sorry to say this Sekhmets Daughter Jun 2012 #54
Welcome to DU, Hope you'll enjoy yourself here.. Cal33 Jun 2012 #77
yes they did it on purpose. iemitsu Jun 2012 #21
To everyone, this was obvious, but not to corporate media BlueCaliDem Jun 2012 #22
Unaware? Hell, the Corps are funding the ostructionism. SunSeeker Jun 2012 #32
Yes. You see, THEY can always find a way to profit, whether the economy is good or bad. kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #23
"Why has job creation in America slowed to a crawl?" nineteen50 Jun 2012 #26
I thought this at the time of the crash, now I know it's true. Sugarcoated Jun 2012 #28
How specificially did they crash it? Supported "free-trade" agreements? Bailed out banksters? AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #29
IMO the banks decided that they wanted their bail-out before Obama became rhett o rick Jun 2012 #38
IMHO, what get's rewarded gets repeated. How much do they want? How much do we have left? AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #39
And they are not smart enough not to kill the goose. nm rhett o rick Jun 2012 #40
I think that they have decoupled from the rest of us. Your tag line is right on the money. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #42
And what they dont realize is that when the little fish are gone, they will be the rhett o rick Jun 2012 #43
Quite frankly, I'm surprised that none of their security people have turned on them. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #45
specifically: Concentration of wealth and deregulation - a prescription for disaster Bill USA Jun 2012 #89
No. Sirveri Jun 2012 #33
IMO they crashed it in 2008 on purpose. They were able to control the bail-out then. rhett o rick Jun 2012 #37
Should we be surprised? Every rethug elected has to sign the contract with Norquist to drown the jwirr Jun 2012 #46
Yes, so they could install their fascist state while the rest of us were in a downfall. Dont call me Shirley Jun 2012 #48
Yes. As another poster stated, some of us saw this coming back in 2003 Dawson Leery Jun 2012 #52
absolutley.freaking.yes. Special Prosciuto Jun 2012 #55
Yes, and they'll do it again jmowreader Jun 2012 #56
Yes, they tanked it on purpose, but zentrum Jun 2012 #57
To The Headline Question, No DallasNE Jun 2012 #58
Read "The Shock Doctrine." alfredo Jun 2012 #60
duh cindyperry2010 Jun 2012 #61
MANY OF THE REPUBS SHOULD BE IN PRISON. HowHasItComeToThis Jun 2012 #62
And what's so sad is they don't even care - the top 1% is doing better than ever. jillan Jun 2012 #63
You even have to ask? calimary Jun 2012 #64
Yes. davidwparker Jun 2012 #65
GOP Platform: "We must destroy America in order to save it!" amb123 Jun 2012 #66
K&R bookmarking....great article. nt snappyturtle Jun 2012 #68
That's what they do The Wizard Jun 2012 #69
"Did Republicans deliberately crash the US economy?" sounds like a funny conspiracy theory to me jeanV Jun 2012 #70
Spam deleted by Morning Dew (MIR Team) Thomas4 Jun 2012 #72
"Keeping millions out of work, so that one man loses his" dougolat Jun 2012 #73
Yes, here is the very plan they used fo do it. chknltl Jun 2012 #79
Yes! joshdawg Jun 2012 #81
+infinity. n/t BumRushDaShow Jun 2012 #83
Yes. nt valerief Jun 2012 #85
Absolutely! Daphne08 Jun 2012 #86
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Did Republicans deliberat...»Reply #89