Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reorg

(3,317 posts)
8. You hold the Swedish system in very low esteem
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 10:06 AM
Aug 2012

if you really believe the final interview with the accused is just a formality and has no bearing whatsoever regarding the collection of testimony and evidence. There would be no point in requiring such an interview if it is not for "information gathering".

Please cite the Swedish law that makes the requirement and show us that it is just meant to be a formality.

Regardless, it seems to make perfect sense for the prosecution to get the interview over with. They can then charge and try him in absentia without further ado, if they still believe they have a case.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Why doesn't Sweden interv...»Reply #8