Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cab67

(2,963 posts)
14. You did mischaracterize my argument.
Sat Sep 20, 2014, 08:35 PM
Sep 2014

The substances in feces and urine are toxic, whether or not they are produced by our bodies. So is carbon dioxide. Saying that formaldehyde is made by human bodies does not, in any way, say it's healthful or without risk.

My point was, is, and remains that the minute traces of formaldehyde in vaccines are too small to pose a real threat. This is different from saying formaldehyde, writ large, is not poisonous.

Most parents would allow a doctor to take an x-ray of their injured child. X-rays are deadly radiation in sufficient doses. Same principle applies.

Again, your apology would be appreciated. Otherwise, we're done.

What bullshit. cab67 Sep 2014 #1
What's your background? Here's a statement by the CDC scientist in the video. proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #2
Beyond my basic literacy and ability to read the peer-reviewed literature, cab67 Sep 2014 #3
This post sounds like a different person wrote it, as contrasted with the earlier remarks. proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #4
This is consistent with my earlier statement. cab67 Sep 2014 #5
Familiar with this? I apologize for the graphics in the video, maybe just close your eyes and listen proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author truedelphi Sep 2014 #7
The formaldehyde issue is a non-issue. cab67 Sep 2014 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author truedelphi Sep 2014 #9
You're using a straw man argument cab67 Sep 2014 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author truedelphi Sep 2014 #12
You did mischaracterize my argument. cab67 Sep 2014 #14
Well, then we're done, as it was proven that mercury and formaldehyde were undesirable in terms of truedelphi Sep 2014 #15
This thread is about statements by whistleblower Dr. William Thompson on his own CDC research career proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #10
And the methodology that is used here is exactly as that described in truedelphi Sep 2014 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author truedelphi Sep 2014 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author truedelphi Sep 2014 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author truedelphi Sep 2014 #20
IMO, 'supportive' posts containing multiple incorrect and unsourced statements are counterproductive proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #21
RE: "It would be interesting to see how they match up with everything else..." proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #22
You might be interested in this summary. proverbialwisdom Sep 2014 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»NEW! Audio of CDC Whistle...»Reply #14