Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Pic Of The Moment: Media Reacts As Over 300,000 People March For Action On Climate Change [View all]jonjensen
(168 posts)33. why do you think you are entitled to news coverage
go surround a coal plant and shut it down you will get all of the news coverage you want. Go after sponsors who pollute put 100,000 people around their headquarters news madia will cover that especially if you don't let them out! Stop whining start acting!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Pic Of The Moment: Media Reacts As Over 300,000 People March For Action On Climate Change [View all]
EarlG
Sep 2014
OP
Is it because that cat's name is W. Bush, more important to call for national attention...
TRoN33
Sep 2014
#4
This wasn't too far off this morning, sadly. The Today Show devoted over 5 minutes
catbyte
Sep 2014
#5
Remember Wolfe Blitzkrieg cheerleading the Iraq War. He loved every minute of the invasion.
freshwest
Sep 2014
#14
Tell me again how we have a government of the people, by the people and for the people
world wide wally
Sep 2014
#11
And what do we get when 90% of the people want some kind of gun control or registration? When 75%
world wide wally
Sep 2014
#35
Fully a quarter to a third nationally, or over a half to 100% don't want that in some states.
freshwest
Sep 2014
#37
I agree with you completely. Now we have to figure out how to get people out there to vote!
world wide wally
Sep 2014
#40
I got more coverage from the BBC than our oligarch owned and operated corporate not news .
geretogo
Sep 2014
#12
Nope. If you go to cnn.com today and type in what I did (as noted in my prev post)
valerief
Sep 2014
#38
Firefox 32.02. It's weird that it took that long for cnn to display a march link.
valerief
Sep 2014
#49
I use CNN World--I think if you use a regional version you might not get as much "stuff!" nt
MADem
Sep 2014
#53
Ah. I just used cnn.com and typed in their search box. It says on the banner it's
valerief
Sep 2014
#56
As I said before, had it been a Bring-Your-Cat Climate Change March, there would have been
valerief
Sep 2014
#50
Could it be that non coverage, of the over 300,000 people march, is that the corporate media
YOHABLO
Sep 2014
#29
And going all in on RW talking points because of all that ad cash flooding in....no way?!
Fred Sanders
Sep 2014
#43
Yea, not nearly enough hardball by activists. Showing up to a march is an action they can ignore.
ChisolmTrailDem
Sep 2014
#36
The headlines would say "50,000 crazed armed lunatics surround philanthropists home"
Dont call me Shirley
Sep 2014
#62
Should maybe run out onto the WH lawn with a sign, would have got more coverage.
Fred Sanders
Sep 2014
#42
Should have thrown a brick through a window and had more shouting...the mass media only will
Fred Sanders
Sep 2014
#41
Hopefully Wolf corp isn't going to be reporting like that as the world crumbles down around him.
Cha
Sep 2014
#52
Doncha know? 10 teabaggers speaking to empty space is more newsworthy than 300,000 marching in NY!
muntrv
Sep 2014
#54
Here's the Media's reaction when anything threatens their owners (the 1%):
blkmusclmachine
Sep 2014
#72