Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Pic Of The Moment: Media Reacts As Over 300,000 People March For Action On Climate Change [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)48. I just put in Climate Change March. No NY or New York....
And it took me to that video I posted and a couple of others.
Maybe it depends upon which edition you're running...?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Pic Of The Moment: Media Reacts As Over 300,000 People March For Action On Climate Change [View all]
EarlG
Sep 2014
OP
Is it because that cat's name is W. Bush, more important to call for national attention...
TRoN33
Sep 2014
#4
This wasn't too far off this morning, sadly. The Today Show devoted over 5 minutes
catbyte
Sep 2014
#5
Remember Wolfe Blitzkrieg cheerleading the Iraq War. He loved every minute of the invasion.
freshwest
Sep 2014
#14
Tell me again how we have a government of the people, by the people and for the people
world wide wally
Sep 2014
#11
And what do we get when 90% of the people want some kind of gun control or registration? When 75%
world wide wally
Sep 2014
#35
Fully a quarter to a third nationally, or over a half to 100% don't want that in some states.
freshwest
Sep 2014
#37
I agree with you completely. Now we have to figure out how to get people out there to vote!
world wide wally
Sep 2014
#40
I got more coverage from the BBC than our oligarch owned and operated corporate not news .
geretogo
Sep 2014
#12
Nope. If you go to cnn.com today and type in what I did (as noted in my prev post)
valerief
Sep 2014
#38
Firefox 32.02. It's weird that it took that long for cnn to display a march link.
valerief
Sep 2014
#49
I use CNN World--I think if you use a regional version you might not get as much "stuff!" nt
MADem
Sep 2014
#53
Ah. I just used cnn.com and typed in their search box. It says on the banner it's
valerief
Sep 2014
#56
As I said before, had it been a Bring-Your-Cat Climate Change March, there would have been
valerief
Sep 2014
#50
Could it be that non coverage, of the over 300,000 people march, is that the corporate media
YOHABLO
Sep 2014
#29
And going all in on RW talking points because of all that ad cash flooding in....no way?!
Fred Sanders
Sep 2014
#43
Yea, not nearly enough hardball by activists. Showing up to a march is an action they can ignore.
ChisolmTrailDem
Sep 2014
#36
The headlines would say "50,000 crazed armed lunatics surround philanthropists home"
Dont call me Shirley
Sep 2014
#62
Should maybe run out onto the WH lawn with a sign, would have got more coverage.
Fred Sanders
Sep 2014
#42
Should have thrown a brick through a window and had more shouting...the mass media only will
Fred Sanders
Sep 2014
#41
Hopefully Wolf corp isn't going to be reporting like that as the world crumbles down around him.
Cha
Sep 2014
#52
Doncha know? 10 teabaggers speaking to empty space is more newsworthy than 300,000 marching in NY!
muntrv
Sep 2014
#54
Here's the Media's reaction when anything threatens their owners (the 1%):
blkmusclmachine
Sep 2014
#72