Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
41. 3,2,3
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 09:32 PM
Sep 2014

The numbers in the title of my post are the number of children Ben Carson, Ted Cruz, and Mike Huckabee have respectively. I realize that only Cruz has it listed that he thinks birth control is the same as abortion inducing drugs, but I assume both Carson and Huckabee (especially Huckabee) also oppose birth control. If these men oppose birth control why is it that none of them have more than three children? How did these men and their wives avoid having ten plus kids? Is it possible that each of these men were able to structure their sex lives around the time their wives were least likely to get pregnant? Did all of these men and/or their wives become infertile after the second, or third child?

Ah, Ted Cruz.... AngryDem001 Sep 2014 #1
I hope he doesn't run yeoman6987 Sep 2014 #4
I'm sorry, but that's just ridiculous. Romney got 27%, and Cruz scares the shit out of sane people. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #7
I didn't know Romney received 27 percent yeoman6987 Sep 2014 #13
Cruz could get more than Bush did ! lunasun Sep 2014 #19
Thanks for the concern. Kingofalldems Sep 2014 #34
The Calgary Kid underpants Sep 2014 #5
Has he had some hair transplantation done? MADem Sep 2014 #22
Wow.The Three Dumbasses catbyte Sep 2014 #2
that's a boatload of batshit crazy noiretextatique Sep 2014 #3
These three are all true nut cases Gothmog Sep 2014 #6
They are just the tip of the iceberg. eom BlueMTexpat Sep 2014 #46
Bat. Shit. Crazy. n/t ColesCountyDem Sep 2014 #8
More batshit under one roof than in all of Africa combined! Initech Sep 2014 #9
The Guano Coalition! riqster Sep 2014 #11
At least most African tribes acknowledge that guano serves useful purposes! Initech Sep 2014 #12
True. They, unlike poop, stop things from being productive. riqster Sep 2014 #14
Nice! n/t tazkcmo Sep 2014 #25
Defending Ray Rice = "values". Lol. nt alp227 Sep 2014 #10
All thes idiots rtracey Sep 2014 #15
How do we get manipulated, let me count the ways. It isn't an accident that the rhett o rick Sep 2014 #16
Seems to me all the time you spend here griping about "conservatives calling themselves Democrats".. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #17
wow... SoapBox Sep 2014 #18
I am disappointed that you choose to disparage me personally in lieu of discussing actual issues. rhett o rick Sep 2014 #29
And I'm disappointed that you continue to use this forum to disparage anyone more moderate than you Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #33
Going along with the conservative crowd is the easy way. rhett o rick Sep 2014 #36
You're the reason why only 20% of Americans self-identify as liberal, and why we will never EVER Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #37
I'm the reason? Really? I have that power? We need a liberal in the WH and that you rhett o rick Sep 2014 #45
Is that written somewhere? I mean someplace that matters? I realize that not everyone who posts... Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #47
It isn't a complete list but I included those items where the Conservative Democrats agree with rhett o rick Sep 2014 #49
I defy you to post a link where I claimed POTUS was a liberal. If I disagree with him, as a Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #51
You said this: "we will never EVER have another liberal in the White House." and I mis-assumed rhett o rick Sep 2014 #52
By the way, I notice that you and other very strong Pres Obama supporters rhett o rick Sep 2014 #53
I, selectively, choose which threads I want to participate in, just as you do. Should I pull up.... Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #54
You equate any discussion that doesn't lavish praise on the President as trashing. rhett o rick Sep 2014 #55
Doesn't seem to matter much what you "don't like", now does it? Some things are beyond you. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #56
Your rationalization has some major holes. If you don't always agree with the president rhett o rick Sep 2014 #57
Right, the Republican Party wants to elect Democrats emulatorloo Sep 2014 #32
Didn't say that. The Republican Party is just a tool of the oligarchs. rhett o rick Sep 2014 #50
Hey, they call it the Values Voter summit, but JEB Sep 2014 #20
And These Are The Folks That Make up The GOp Base RadicalGeek Sep 2014 #21
Moe, Larry & Curly. Historic NY Sep 2014 #23
please do not insult larry, curly and moe--at least they served a useful purpose--they made niyad Sep 2014 #38
value voters have the same values as the manson family. jonjensen Sep 2014 #24
Someone in the State Dept oldandhappy Sep 2014 #26
In other words . . ."We got nothing." Major Hogwash Sep 2014 #27
This is the radical right of the GOP. Thinkingabout Sep 2014 #28
“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.” EEO Sep 2014 #30
Today I saw a Carson for President 2016.. Historic NY Sep 2014 #31
If the Republicans gain control of the Senate, then we've got nothing either. YOHABLO Sep 2014 #35
so rtracey Sep 2014 #42
It's the SOS with the GOP SmittynMo Sep 2014 #39
Crazytalk blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #40
3,2,3 erpowers Sep 2014 #41
What they mean by "values" is that they have value and other people don't n/t eridani Sep 2014 #43
Snap, Crackle, & Pop. nt Jamaal510 Sep 2014 #44
! BlancheSplanchnik Sep 2014 #48
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Pic Of The Moment: "...»Reply #41